Assistance with a Macro about diceparser HOT 16 CLOSED

Are you sure of your example?
As far as I understood, rolling 77 after 3 temp pass, should give a temp pass.

51-95
After one temp pass it becomes
46-100 or 41-95
Second one:
36-95.

DiceParser won't be able to store previous rolls or values.
But it is possible to pass modificaters and compute appropriate range

from diceparser.

I went ahead and closed this as I found another solution using DiceParcer and Google Sheets.

To clarify. The temp pass or temp fail regions would never increase. Receiving those rolls increase the full pass and full fail regions.

!d100i[>95]{"full pass %1"}i[>50]{"temp pass %1"}i[>5]{"temp fail %1"}{"full fail %1"}

This is the base that it's using.
Using Google sheets i can set up ifs statements regarding cells that players can input how many temp passes and temp fails they have received.

Thus is they 2 temp fails and 3 temp passes the Google sheet will output the following
!d100i[>65]{"full pass %1"}i[>50]{"temp pass %1"}i[>25]{"temp fail %1"}{"full fail %1"}
For my players to use on the DiceParcer Bot.

The original idea was to see if it was possible to only use DiceParcer. Using the Macro Feature that allows you to submit 2 values that end up replacing values in the Macro. - The regular-expression

I played around with this and was able to figure out how it assigns the values. with the \1 and \2 in the example provided on the Documentation.

However I was unable to figure out a way for it to edit roll result even with the ability to have the macro enter \1 and \2 as the number of times you have temp passed for failed

This is why I defaulted to using a combination of DiceParcer and Google Sheets.

from diceparser.

The provided snippets are of the Google Sheet and the three formulas used for how I got my desired outcome.

from diceparser.

You are on the right way. Give me some time and I will go back to you with macro that make the use of Google sheet less important and useful

from diceparser.

Take your time. Thank you.

from diceparser.

this macro:

!macro ninja([0-9+),([0-9+) d100;5+\1*5;96-\2*5;$1i[<$2]{"full fail $1"}i[<51]{"temp fail $1"}i[<$3]{"temp pass $1"}{"full pass  $1"} 1

to call it : "ninja0,0", "ninja2,3" ....

from diceparser.

This is perfect. It took a moment to understand why it wasn't working though. Seems a ] was missing after both the 9s.
Once I fixed that it worked perfectly.
Thank you so much

from diceparser.

There seemed to be some minor issues. However your code gave me an accurate example of how I can use the macro function. Thus I was able to reverse engineer it and change to numbers I needed to accordingly.

And thanks to your help I now know how to do this in the future should I ever need something complex like this.
Thank you So much
You are awesome!

from diceparser.

!macro ninja([0-9]+),([0-9]+) d100;5+\1*10;95-\2*10;$1i[>$3]{"full pass $1"}i[>50]{"temp pass $1"}i[>$2]{"temp fail $1"}{"full fail $1"} 1

the different is that the change is suppose to be by 10 and not 5. And I've set them in greater than order. Personal preference.
Functions the same.

from diceparser.

I do have another question. Is it possible to set it so nothing above a certain number is accepted.
The way this works that that have any number above 4 would essentially break the code.

And if you can limit it would it be as follows.
ninja([0-4]+),([0-4]+)

or

ninja([0-4]),([0-4])
?

from diceparser.

I think it is:
ninja([0-4]),([0-4])

the + at the end means "At least one or more"

from diceparser.

Thanks

from diceparser.

!macro ninja([0-9]+),([0-9]+),([0-9]+) d100+\3;5+\1*10;95-\2*10;$1i[>$3]{"full pass $1"}i[>50]{"temp pass $1"}i[>$2]{"temp fail $1"}{"full fail $1"} 1

I've seem to run into another issue that I can't seem to get past. The issue occurs if it's ran as a macro. Or if I simplify it as a regular dice roll
!d100+10;5;95;$1i[>$3]{"full pass $1"}i[>50]{"temp pass $1"}i[>$2]{"temp fail $1"}{"full fail $1"}

It seems that any modification to the dice rolls breaks it. I've tested this using the $ command as well. To have the dice roll in the first instruction and then edit the value in the second. Doing either results in this break. Where is just lists the numbers. I've included two screenshots to show this off.
If it isn't possible to edit the roll let me know as this limits other possible macros. Such as tests of strengths between players both using their buffs.

from diceparser.

!1d100+10;5;95;$1i:[>$3]{"full pass $1"}{$1i:[>50]{"temp pass $1"}{$1i:[>$2]{"temp fail $1"}{"full fail $1"}}}

from diceparser.

With more details, as you put +10 at the end of dice roll, it change the result type from dicelist to number. And the bare if expects a dicelist as previous node.
The : asks the ifs to evaluate on number value

from diceparser.

Thanks.
This worked wonders and I was able to put it to work on other macros. I appreciate all your assistance!

from diceparser.