adopt network-uri more widely about rdf4h HOT 4 OPEN

Item 1 is discussed in two places: haskell/network-uri#11 and haskell/network-uri#2

Item 2 is resolved: haskell/network-uri@e7aad56

from rdf4h.

@robstewart57 That's great to see that we've stirred a few interested people here and there. Thanks for taking it to network-uri devs!

I think that we could perhaps disregard that performance hit when converting String to Text for now, if you're going to go ahead and implement Node !URI asap. I don't think it's so crucial at this point however. Perhaps, we should rather cooperate with network-uri devs instead. I read on the issues that you pointed out - there's apparently some room for improvement (including that PortNumber instead of Int suggestion). I'd be happy to help with network-uri2 or whatever, once we've sorted out RDF4H problems ;-)

Let this issue stay here until further updates from network-uri.

from rdf4h.

In #55 I have implemented a newtype IRI with IRI validation and resolution.

from rdf4h.

@wismill

In #55 I have implemented a newtype IRI with IRI validation and resolution.

What is the status of this issue 21, after your IRI validation and resolution? Should its use be adopted more widely in this library?

from rdf4h.