Consider adding a license about chameleonultra HOT 7 CLOSED

The project start follow GPLV3.
View commit: a048187

from chameleonultra.

The Chameleon Ultra uses some code from Proxmark3 RRG Repo, perhaps we should continue the license statement from Proxmark3 RRG Repo.

from chameleonultra.

wouldnt the gpl v3 (under which the pm3 repo is licensed?) require the licensing under gplv3 if parts of that code is used?
also: does indeed make sense

from chameleonultra.

I am not familiar with GPL V3, which may require ICEMAN's help.

from chameleonultra.

from my understanding, if you use part of GPL licensed code, the project this licensed code is in must also be licensed under the same GPL version? (eg GPL V3)

from chameleonultra.

from chameleonultra.

Yes, GPLV3 is inheritance. Our project should be GPLV3 or more strictly licensed, but I think GPLV3 should be enough. A good project cannot be separated from more people/groups that create value for themselves or others, sure, must following GPLV3.

from chameleonultra.