Can only add "ISOLATE" network about webvirtmgr HOT 4 CLOSED

Hey boozedog,
There are actually many more network options and forwarding methods than seen in the WebUI. I was actually looking for a direct bridge network configuration without any NAT'ing / forwarding. I am in the process of implementing that option. Is there a particular option you were looking for?

from webvirtmgr.

I also have a problem similar to this. I prefer to create all network bridges myself, and WebVirtMgr is refusing to use my bridge.

br0       Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:30:48:C3:A6:B4  
          inet addr:192.168.2.5  Bcast:192.168.2.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::230:48ff:fec3:a6b4/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:277381 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:161358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:355356420 (338.8 MiB)  TX bytes:42752607 (40.7 MiB)

When I attempt to add this network to WebVirtMgr, I get the following error:
Input subnet pool error

I am adding:
Name: br0
Network: 192.168.2.0/24
No DHCP
ROUTING

from webvirtmgr.

Use IPcal to calculate your network. Example: br0 - 192.168.2.5/32 gw 192.168.2.1; virbr0 - 192.168.2.8/29 gw 192.168.2.9(Routing). WebVirtMgr can create sunbnet if you input correct netmask to route network on bridge device then need add route this network on your GW on bridge interface. This error broadcasts Libvirt not WebVirtMgr.

from webvirtmgr.

boozedog: Fix this bug.

from webvirtmgr.