Including noise terms in the symbolic derivation about quantumcumulants.jl HOT 2 OPEN

Hi @DHuybrechts
Yes, that's correct, all building blocks are there and it should be straightforward to include the noise.
@Nico0oblr is currently working on including noise from measurement back-action, once this is implemented it should be easy to adapt the code for the noise of the quantum Langevin equation. Maybe you could have a look at his measurement_backaction branch.

In the following papers they also include noise for measurement back-action, they show some code in the appendix:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.00868.pdf
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13068

Let me know if you need more information.

from quantumcumulants.jl.

Thank you very much for this information @ChristophHotter! I will have a look at the suggest branch. From a very quick look at the papers I do indeed believe this is exactly what I was searching for, thank you for pointing me in this direction.

from quantumcumulants.jl.