trimmerFun should be called from the controller design, and then constant afterwards about aerobenchvv HOT 2 CLOSED

Also: trimmerFun always uses the Stevens & Lewis model. It might make sense to output a Stevens & Lewis trim point and a Morelli trim point, since these might differ. Then, online, you select the one based on the user selection.

I think the control design has the same issue (always using the Stevens & Lewis model). Maybe this is more work to fix than it's worth... since the models should be approximately the same.

from aerobenchvv.

Within 'runF16', the trim/equilibrium states are now hard-coded to match the LQR design point. 'trimmerFun' should only need to be called if we attempt to create a fully linear model (for an even simpler case study?) or if we redesign the controllers. Because the trim points are hard-coded, however (same as the LQR gain matrices), they will need to be manually modified if we shift to a gain-scheduled controller. I have not yet addressed the S&L vs Morelli trim point issue. I agree that the trim points should be extremely similar.

from aerobenchvv.