xunit-support about nof5 HOT 5 CLOSED

On the Jenkins Server?

from nof5.

xunit-support for nof5, so that can jenkins is able to handle it;)

from nof5.

Is it a problem at the moment? The mocha tests are running with the xunit reporter too and jenkins is working with that file. Try it and if you have a problem with it tell me again, ok?

from nof5.

Hey @matthaias !

We're here in the nof5 repo. It is all about running tests on clients. The xunit reporter from mocha does not work on the client site, does it?
Check out the first words from Readme.md to get a short description about nof5.
But I can explain it to you tomorrow.

from nof5.

I've thought about the interface for xunit-file support:

• nof5 should write a xunit file if an option --x or --xunit is given.
• If --x or --xunit are given without a path nof5 should write the xunit-file into process.cwd() else to the given path.

But there is a problem, because nof5 is not able to know which clients must connect and send their results to complete the test. I don't see any other way than passing this information to nof5. I think this should be done with a special hook, probably something like: nof5.clients.hook.js. This is similar to the other existing hooks, e.g. for passing additional middleware for the browserify bundler. According to the current convention for hooks the nof5.clients.hook.js might looks like this:

• If there is a file named nof5.client.hook.js in the test folder, than this file will be automatically used.
• If there is an explicit path given than by an option --c or --clients than this file will be used.
• The file should be a module exporting a function .use()
• The .use() function returns an {} containing options.
• These could be useful options:
  • clients: ["Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/21.0.1180.79 Safari/537.1", "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/14.0.1", "and so on"..]
  • timeout: number
• I recommend to use the navigator.userAgent string as this will make a client unique

@matthaias what do you think about this?

from nof5.