Shouldn't AFHTTPRequestOperation return some data? about afnetworking-synchronous HOT 4 CLOSED

Hmm, the category declares -responseObject for the subclasses. I suppose it'd be reasonable to return -responseData for AFHTTPRequestOperation itself, when a more specific subclass is not in use.

I'm guessing you're not using a subclass, right? Also, are you still using AFNetworking 1.x?

from afnetworking-synchronous.

Wow, that was fast!
Yup, no need for a subclass.
I'm still on AFNetworking 1.x, I have some legacy code that depends on it.
I'll probably update to AFN 2 when time permits, but I understood that it was som restructuring needed and not jus a recompile... ;-)

from afnetworking-synchronous.

Cool, yeah, I haven't used AFN 2 yet. I watched some of the patches go by and I think the synchronous case may be easy to handle in the new version. If not this will need rewriting to accommodate it.

It sounds strange, but I hadn't considered the use case where you use the data directly rather than in a subclass. Some programmers might want -responseString instead of -responseData, but it seems like -responseData is at least possibly useful, where nil definitely is not.

I'll get this changed tonight. Thanks for the patch!

from afnetworking-synchronous.

You're welcome!
I thank You for providing this excellent category that just blended nicely into my project and solved my synchronous need in no time.
Please make it compatible with AFN2, so I have another reason to myself to make the switch.. :-)

from afnetworking-synchronous.