Meeting cadence about admin HOT 5 CLOSED

I strongly support for Martin's model of occasional (every 3 months?) multi-day in-person meetings, once "in-person" is feasible, and something approximating that model until then.

I promise this is not primarily motivated by my hope for trips to Australia or Singapore.

from admin.

With the minor caveat that I hope we won't be doing in-person meetings every six weeks, I agree.

from admin.

Just a personal note from a timezone perspective. Weekly meetings that alternate between timezones will either lead to my own contribution being diminished greatly. Either because I have to destroy my wellbeing joining 3am calls or because I miss calls. I can't see any situation in which a weekly cadence is feasible for me.

from admin.

I certainly hope that we don't meet in person that often.

However, if we are going to do something this big and tricky in any reasonable time frame, I suspect that a few meetings a year will be necessary. I have observed that the speed at which agreement on difficult questions is reached during the pandemic has slowed. A lot. Something this big could take a decade at that place.

from admin.

Going to close this issue because there is now a meeting cadence and timing issue in patcg/meetings.

from admin.