Rendering of leisure=garden + garden:type=residential + access=private about organicmaps HOT 8 OPEN

how about this?:
before/after

from organicmaps.

Probably the original logic was that one takes care of one's garden better than the municipality does its public spaces :P, but in a map, public spaces should stand out more than private spaces.

This is a good change.

from organicmaps.

Great, this is what I envisioned when opening the discussion. Many thanks.

from organicmaps.

Isn't it too light now, lighter than a grassland? Should "more green" mean "more trees"?

from organicmaps.

Isn't it too light now, lighter than a grassland? Should "more green" mean "more trees"?

leisure=garden (residential esp.) could be just a plain lawn or a couple of garden beds w/ carrots and cabbage :)

from organicmaps.

Agree.

How different/contrasting are parks, grass, and gardens in other maps?

from organicmaps.

• some screenshots and a related discussion #4758 (comment)
• my suggestion there #4758 (comment)
• related #5422

from organicmaps.

If we choose to stick with a 3-color palette then gardens should be medium color I guess (lighter than forests and darker than grassy areas). However leisure-park is medium also and we'll lose some nice detalisation.

Actually leisure-park could be very different density-wise from a forest to completely open. Its more a designation of usage rather than a physical description. So maybe we can "invent" a separate hue for parks? So that any kind of "physical" vegetation could look more or less distinct on it?

Upd: though leisure-garden also could be anything from trees to grass :) actually its not easy to draw a line between parks and gardens :)

from organicmaps.