Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (7)

nmav avatar nmav commented on August 26, 2024

I'd increase the waiting time for more than a month, since packages don't become obsolete so quickly and prospective maintainers may not be immediately available to adopt a package. Otherwise I pretty much agree.

Practice in other distributions has also shown the need for unresponsive maintainer process, i.e., someone disappearing and not contributing any more. There should also be a similar process to take the maintainership of such a package.

from packages.

hnyman avatar hnyman commented on August 26, 2024

What would actually happen to the packages removed? Really deleted? The first 1-2 packages removed from here (tiff, giflib) were added back to oldpackages, but that does not sound feasible in the long run. I guess libgsm has been the only completely deleted package, so far.

I feel uncomfortable with completely removing packages. Information about them should still be somehow available at the tip of the repository, not just at an arbitrary point in history.

An alternative might be to create a directory path "/abandoned" or "/unmaintained" and move the packages there. Perhaps mark them either with "BROKEN" or with a new flag "ABANDONED", so that buildbot would skip building them. If somebody later wants to adopt them, they would be more easily available.

from packages.

jow- avatar jow- commented on August 26, 2024

I too think there could be an abandonned repository within the same github organization where unmaintained stuff gets moved to. However I'm against keeping the bitrot directly within packages.git

from packages.

thess avatar thess commented on August 26, 2024

I agree with @jow, we should use the packages-abandoned repo right here which he created last April. I can resurrect libgsm and start things going if I have check-in rights to that repo. If tiff and giflib are in oldpackages, I can move those too.

from packages.

hnyman avatar hnyman commented on August 26, 2024

If packages-abandoned is adopted, I suggest that it is added to feeds.conf.default as a commented-out feed, so that users can find it a bit easier.

from packages.

jow- avatar jow- commented on August 26, 2024

Fine with me.

from packages.

dibdot avatar dibdot commented on August 26, 2024

reference current discussion #6584 and close this one.

from packages.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.