Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (20)

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

It looks like sensor_multilevel is sending incorrect commands in this branch - not sure why, but I've added a test and it does detect the problem. That probably covers the first 2 issues (or at least part of them) - the reason it repeats is because the binding asks for a certain sensor, but the device returns a different one - so it asks again...

I've not looked at the other 2 issues yet - probably one for tomorrow night...

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

I've just pushed an update that will hopefully fix the multilevel sensor issue.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

mhilbush avatar mhilbush commented on July 23, 2024

Great. I just pulled build 62, and will test it tonight or tomorrow morning.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

mhilbush avatar mhilbush commented on July 23, 2024

The sensor multilevel reporting is looking much better. Thanks.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

I think I’ve now fixed the multiple requests for the MANUFACTURER information - this will get pushed tonight hopefully.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

mhilbush avatar mhilbush commented on July 23, 2024

Ok. I should be able to pull down the new build tonight, but I might not be able to test it until Sunday.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

No probs - I’ve just pushed the latest update. I’ll try and look over the no-op issue as well before Sunday...

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

I also found a bug in no-op processing, so that might also be fixed now (although not 100% sure).

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

mhilbush avatar mhilbush commented on July 23, 2024

Ok. I see there's a build 65 on CB. Does that one have the no-op fix?

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

mhilbush avatar mhilbush commented on July 23, 2024

Ok. I downloaded 65 and have it installed. I'm VPN'ed into home, so I can't wake up any of the battery devices. I'll just have to wait for them to wake up on their own. :-(

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

mhilbush avatar mhilbush commented on July 23, 2024

For Node 9, I'm still seeing repetitive version_command_class_get no_op requests starting at 16:53.46, 16:54:25, 16:56:21, etc. in the logs. Again, I'm not sure if this is a device issue, database issue, or binding issue.

For nodes 5 and 7, I'm seeing frequent and repetitive get requests being sent when it appears the devices are asleep, but perhaps I'm not interpreting that correctly. Are these possibly poll requests that are supposed to be queued and sent when the device wakes up?

Other than the above two questions, this version is looking pretty solid.

Sorry, forgot to attach the log...
zwave.txt

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

Can you send an updated log?

I doubt the no-op issue is database or device. I know that there’s a problem with this during startup - not in this branch specifically, but in the binding somewhere.

I’d be interested in the sleeping thing - maybe this transaction manager bypasses the wakeup class queue - I see another test coming for this...

On 3 Sep 2016, at 12:15, Mark Hilbush [email protected] wrote:

For Node 9, I'm still seeing repetitive version_command_class_get no_op requests starting at 16:53.46, 16:54:25, 16:56:21, etc. in the logs. Again, I'm not sure if this is a device issue, database issue, or binding issue.

For nodes 5 and 7, I'm seeing frequent and repetitive get requests being sent when it appears the devices are asleep, but perhaps I'm not interpreting that correctly. Are these possibly poll requests that are supposed to be queued and sent when the device wakes up?

Other than the above two questions, this version is looking pretty solid.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #64 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA_kQ-oq_mas8P2ksRhKWyDOFE5-PU2Uks5qmVbpgaJpZM4Jym1Y.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

mhilbush avatar mhilbush commented on July 23, 2024

Yeah, as soon as I hit comment I realized I forgot to attach the log. :-o Comment above was edited to include the log.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

Thanks ;)

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

NO_OP problem should now be fixed. I’d fixed this in the master branch a while back, but it must have been after the transaction branch was split and it didn’t merge for some reason...

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

mhilbush avatar mhilbush commented on July 23, 2024

Confirming no-op is fixed in build 71.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

@mhilbush do you think we can close this or is something still missing? I'm tempted to close and open another issue if we find something as I've lost track of what is still open in this.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

mhilbush avatar mhilbush commented on July 23, 2024

The only thing I'm not sure about was that the binding was sending transactions to battery devices while they were asleep. If this is resolved, or will be resolved in the rework of the queuing, then this can be closed.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

cdjackson avatar cdjackson commented on July 23, 2024

Yep - good point. I’m not sure if I fixed that, but it is/was an issue. I’ll close this and make a specific issue…

On 16 Sep 2016, at 19:43, Mark Hilbush [email protected] wrote:

The only thing I'm not sure about was that the binding was sending transactions to battery devices while they were asleep. If this is resolved, or will be resolved in the rework of the queuing, then this can be closed.


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #64 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA_kQzRrpfo1IGmuebGP6FcWqfS50j1mks5qqtVFgaJpZM4Jym1Y.

from org.openhab.binding.zwave.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.