Celeba64 training yielding nan during training about nvae HOT 12 CLOSED

Hi Luke,

I remember your batch size is very small. We anneal the learning to 1e-2 in 5 epochs. There is a good chance that you are seeing NaN because of the high learning rate for small batch size. I would recommend reducing the learning rate to smaller values such as 5e-3 or even 1e-3.

You can increase the frequency of saving checkpoint by modifying this like:

If you change save_freq to 1, it will save every epoch.

from nvae.

Hi, @kaushik333 ,when i ran into epoch 5, i countered the same problem of present 'nan' result.

and, i remembered one detail on preprocessing Celeba64:

i mentioned that i download the dataset separately, and then, to overcome the problem of data = dset.celeba.CelebA(root="/NVAE/data/root", split=split, target_type='attr', transform=None, download=False) in create_celeba64_lmdb.py file, i tried to modify function (CelebA), where there is a check func:
def _check_integrity(self): return True # for (_, md5, filename) in self.file_list: # fpath = os.path.join(self.root, self.base_folder, filename) # _, ext = os.path.splitext(filename) # # Allow original archive to be deleted (zip and 7z) # # Only need the extracted images # if ext not in [".zip", ".7z"] and not check_integrity(fpath, md5): # return False # # # Should check a hash of the images # return os.path.isdir(os.path.join(self.root, self.base_folder, "img_align_celeba"))

As you can see, i tried to over across this original check.

I'm afraid that this is the source of the problem.

I wanna ask for your help, and wanna know how you solve the problem of data preprocessing.

Ps. When I tried to retrain from stored ckpt model, with the command of --cont_training, and noticed that the training return from epoch 1, not the latest epoch of 5, what a pity of days waiting.

Sincerely,

Luke Huang

from nvae.

Do you get NAN result from the beginning?

In my personal operation, due to the GoogleDrive downloading problem, i get the CelebaA-64 separately, and put them in the same folder(./script/celeba_org/celeba), which contains (identity_CelebA.txt
img_align_celeba.zip
list_attr_celeba.txt
list_bbox_celeba.txt
list_eval_partition.txt
list_landmarks_align_celeba.txt
list_landmarks_celeba.txt)

then do as the instruction of README about preprocessing process
`

• python create_celeba64_lmdb.py --split train --img_path ./data1/datasets/celeba_org/celeba --lmdb_path ./data1/datasets/celeba_org/celeba64_lmdb

• python create_celeba64_lmdb.py --split valid --img_path ./data1/datasets/celeba_org/celeba --lmdb_path ./data1/datasets/celeba_org/celeba64_lmdb

• python create_celeba64_lmdb.py --split test --img_path ./data1/datasets/celeba_org/celeba --lmdb_path ./data1/datasets/celeba_org/celeba64_lmdb

`

No any other change.

And at training process:
`

• python train.py --data ./scripts/data1/datasets/celeba_org/celeba64_lmdb --root ./CHECKPOINT_DIR --save ./EXPR_ID --dataset celeba_64 \

--num_channels_enc 64 --num_channels_dec 64 --epochs 1000 --num_postprocess_cells 2 --num_preprocess_cells 2 \

--num_latent_scales 3 --num_latent_per_group 20 --num_cell_per_cond_enc 2 --num_cell_per_cond_dec 2 \

--num_preprocess_blocks 1 --num_postprocess_blocks 1 --weight_decay_norm 1e-1 --num_groups_per_scale 20 \

--batch_size 4 --num_nf 1 --ada_groups --num_process_per_node 1 --use_se --res_dist --fast_adamax
`

Besides of the address of the data that I put change to the corresponding address, the only wrong I countered was the parameter --num_process_per_node 1 means the GPU number that available.

Here is some provisional result:

And for 1024*1024 pic:

🌟 Hoping that my expression can do any help for you and any other counter problems!

from nvae.

Thanks @Lukelluke! I am glad that everything worked fine for you.

@kaushik333, do you get NaN from the very beginning of the training? Or does it happen after a few epochs? We haven't done anything beyond running that command to generate the LMDB datasets.

from nvae.

Hello @arash-vahdat and @Lukelluke .

I get NaN right from the beginning which is very strange.

I am now trying what @Lukelluke did i.e. download celebA myself and follow the same instructions (not sure if this will help, but still giving it a shot).

from nvae.

I haven't seen NaN at the beginning of training, especially given that the learning rate is linearly increased from a very small value, this is unlikely to happen. Most training instability happens after we anneal the learning rate which happens in --warmup_epochs epochs.

from nvae.

@arash-vahdat @Lukelluke I seemed to have solved the issue. The training now proceeds as expected. Downloading the dataset myself somehow seemed to do the trick (Strange, I know).

But anyways thank you very much :)

from nvae.

I am very glad that it worked. Thanks @Lukelluke for the hint. I will add a link to this issue to help other folks that may run into the same issue.

from nvae.

It a great pleasure that i can do any help to this great job.

Thank you Dr.Vahdat again for your kindness of releasing this official implement !

Hoping that we can get more inspirations from this work which make VAE great again !

from nvae.

@Lukelluke are you sure its epoch 5 and not 50? I run it with batch_size 8 and ~5000 iterations is 1 epoch (I know because train_nelbo gets printed only once per epoch). If youre using batch_size 4, I guess you're at 25th epoch?

Also, I had to stop my training ~20th epoch. But I never faced this issue.

from nvae.

Dr. @arash-vahdat :

In order to train it on 256x256 images, are there any additional architectural changes or do I need to just alter the flags according to info provided in the paper?

from nvae.

Thank you so much! Dr.@arash-vahdat , I changed the frequency as you taught, and modify the '--learning_rate 1e-3' , hoping that everything will be ok.

Ps. I'm now trying to apply NVAE in audio field, however i countered some special problem:

• We know that in image field, we usually cut one pic to [n, n] shape, like 256256 / 6464, and i wanna try to feed audio feature in the shape of [batch, channel=1, frame, dimension of feature], and after looking into your implement, i feel that would be a hard job of make it adaptive to any dimension of pic, like [channel=3, m, n], where m != n can also work. Could you give me any suggestion or trick, that would be nice.

Hello, @kaushik333 , I reconfirmed that that 'nan' error happened during epoch 5, and i take the advice of Dr.arash-vahdat , modify the init learning rate to 1e-3, hoping that can run successfully after 5 epoch.

And congratulate you that run successfully, pity that my GPU can only support 4 batch size, lol

As for 256*256, as i mentioned that i tried to run successfully, and i just follow the README, download tfrecord files and preprocess to lmdb data format.

and as for command, all due to my gpu limitation, i reduced the --num_channels_enc 32 --num_channels_dec 32 and with --batch_size 1, it's pretty slow, but got unbelievable reconstruction result. But maybe the training epoch is not enough, the sampled result still not present human face, i will run ahead later.

And if you need, my pleasure to share pretrained ckpt model.

from nvae.