Inconsistent weights of Bamum glyphs about bamum HOT 2 CLOSED

More to the point, the syllabic glyphs vary in weight across the weight axis but the Supplemental glyphs do not! But I sort of see a logic in that - living scripts in Noto get multiple weights whereas historical scripts get one weight, and here we have a combination of a living and a historical script.

The regular weight of the syllabic glyphs is correct, so if anything the logographs would need to be thickened up to match. But that would cause design problems; there's not much more room to add weight to them. I'm not sure what a good way forward on this is.

from bamum.

I'm going to say this can't be done without redrawing the whole font, which we won't do for a historical script which works fine in regular, or by removing the variation which we won't do for a living script. So there is no good way forward.

from bamum.