Workflow entries behaviour and suggestions about bise HOT 6 CLOSED

Le 27 févr. 2019 à 18:38, Leandro Scholz ***@***.***> a écrit : Dear team, @PerrineGilloteaux @miura @czhci, I added about 9 new workflows and a bunch of components/collections on bise this week (used in BIAFLOWS) and I noticed a few issues and undesired behavior when adding them. previous workflow step autocompletes to existing biii.eu nodes, but it should (I assume) trace back to existing steps in the workflow being described. current workflow step if read that way (considering what I just wrote in 1) ) should be renamed as current workflow component/process and this indeed must autocomplete to an existing biii.eu node, which should Ideally link to a component. Step numbers. Shouldn't this be set automatically as they are added/reordered? I would say the template using "Step number: description" should be changed just to "description" and we then should use an automatic step number (I am not sure how feasible this is, so definitely open to discussion). I can give as an example a workflow that has a simple overview of what it does and does not have steps associated to a certain biii.eu (I consider this acceptable but not ideal) below in this example, I could not associate the step order since they are not associated with biii.eu nodes. but I would add the workflow as steps 12 and 34 running in parallel, then 5 getting results of 2 and 4 to run. Please let me know if additional clarification is needed. I hope these comments help. Cheers, Leandro. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.