Include nested of nested association about fast_jsonapi HOT 11 CLOSED

Me too! IIRC, AMS would specify it as { include: [ { author: [ :profile ] }, :tags ] }. This approach seems ideal because the developer can define a deeply nested hash and arrays to reflect the deeply nested relationships.

from fast_jsonapi.

@NickBeukema I’ll try to make it work by the end of this week, didn’t have time lately

from fast_jsonapi.

I'd love to help as well - this is the main blocker to replacing AMS and basking in the velocity of fast_jsonapi

from fast_jsonapi.

@christophersansone Agree. Using the AMS approach would be ideal. We would like to have this feature added to fast_jsonapi as soon as we can. @potato20 @blocknotes pull requests are welcome

from fast_jsonapi.

Trying to make it work right now, it's kinda related to #67. Should I wait for it to be merged first?

from fast_jsonapi.

@SumLare ya i think there are a lot of changes coming up so do you mind waiting a little bit. We are overwhelmed by the response and would love to add all the features that are part of the JSON:API spec.

Once some of the relevant pull requests are merge to dev go ahead and create one with all your changes.

from fast_jsonapi.

@shishirmk yea sure looking forward to help you guys.

from fast_jsonapi.

@SumLare is there anything you need assistance with in completing this? Currently working on a project that would benefit from this, and would love to help if needed.

from fast_jsonapi.

@jshow @SumLare @NickBeukema i think this would be a good time to attack this problem. Have any of you started working on it?

from fast_jsonapi.

@shailesh33 , I've put together a PR for discussion

#152

from fast_jsonapi.

This should be released in version 1.2 of the gem

from fast_jsonapi.