Add Role or Type to models where it make sense about nautobot-app-firewall-models HOT 6 CLOSED

Thinking of ipam:Role? I like the idea, kinda think ipam:Role should be extras:Role instead for an appropriate place.

from nautobot-app-firewall-models.

Yes until we have something better : either we can use ipam:role or we should consider adding a new role model as part of the plugin. Recently, we went with option 2 for another plugin but both have pro and cons

I agree we should have a generic extras:role model, similar to extras:status in core, it's being tracked as part of the Core Data Model Epic > nautobot/nautobot#768
I don't think we have a dedicated issue for it right now.

from nautobot-app-firewall-models.

I would vote option 2 with the desire to move to extras:role when it is added to core.

from nautobot-app-firewall-models.

It could just be a subclass of ipam:role to be able to avoid confusion on having to assign an ipam role that's used in a service definition.

from nautobot-app-firewall-models.

I would vote option 2 with the desire to move to extras:role when it is added to core.

Sounds good to me,
FYI, I opened a new issue in core to track that nautobot/nautobot#1063

from nautobot-app-firewall-models.

Accepted as a duplicated model with desire to go to extras:role

from nautobot-app-firewall-models.