Integration of cgminer for Skein-Algorithm about multipoolminer HOT 7 CLOSED

I may add it.

Just a rant:
It baffles me as to why so many people on GitHub spend loads of time creating something then can't be bothered to mark it as a release and attach a compiled version. Also, why don't people fork miners properly then submit pull requests with the new/improved algorithms??? GitHub has the ability to organize the chaos but developers just don't seem to care.

from multipoolminer.

First of all : thank you for considering it.

So because I'm pretty new and kind of in the process and kind of new:
Best would be to fork the repo, build it and send in a pull request?
Then I could probably do it with my really underdeveloped knowlegde of mingw.

I allready trying to do it locally with a new PS-miner-script, but my knowledge is really in the process of growing and it ended up with nothing.

from multipoolminer.

Don't worry about trying to fork this. It was the number of cgminer spinoffs with no complied releases that riled me.

I just don't want to add every miner under the sun especially as there is no direct link to dynamically download. To add it is very simple if the api is the same as sgminer.

from multipoolminer.

I haven't tested it but put this in the 'miners' folder. Let me know if it works.
Reorder.txt

from multipoolminer.

The txt-file is working fine, just the hashrate-calculation seems a bit weird (live-hashrate is null).

Although miner is running in API-Mode.

API running in local read access mode on port 4028

Hashrate with 6*RX480 around 1,45-1,6 Gh/s.

I just packed a few files in there, let me know if you need more info or a translation.

2017-01-04_02-29-52.txt
Reorder_Skein_HashRate.txt
Reorder_Keccak_HashRate.txt

from multipoolminer.

Just rerun the benchmark. Still 0 Hashrate. My uneducated guess is the parsing must be different.

from multipoolminer.

Done. It had a mh/s variable instead of a kh/s variable.

Wish everyone just passed h/s in the APIs or at least the multiplier in a separate field.

If you measured file size on a system then it would always be in bytes (unformatted raw figure) then you format the scale for display. It's just bad programming to pass formatted numbers in random scales.

from multipoolminer.