Comments (10)
I strongly suspect that the issue is in this code in src/pbrt/gpu/aggregate.cpp
(and possibly in other related places in that file):
input.triangleArray.vertexFormat = OPTIX_VERTEX_FORMAT_FLOAT3;
input.triangleArray.vertexStrideInBytes = sizeof(Point3f);
input.triangleArray.numVertices = mesh->nVertices;
Point3f *pGPU;
CUDA_CHECK(cudaMalloc(&pGPU, mesh->nVertices * sizeof(Point3f)));
CUDA_CHECK(cudaMemcpy(pGPU, mesh->p, mesh->nVertices * sizeof(Point3f),
cudaMemcpyHostToDevice));
OptiX only takes float32 and doesn't support double precision. However, with PBRT_FLOAT_AS_DOUBLE
, Point3f
is 3 doubles, yet it's being copied directly and given to OptiX, which assumes it is floats.
I'm unable to dig into this further for another week or two but it should be a straightforward fix; allocate an array of floats of sufficient size, copy the Point3f values into that, then give that to OptiX instead. (And make sure that input.triangleArray.vertexStrideInBytes is 3*sizeof(float)==12
.) From a quick skim of that file I don't see any other suspicious places that do similar invalid casts, so that might be enough to do it.
from pbrt-v4.
Hi.. in my test here, remove #329 don't fix this issue
from pbrt-v4.
@TiernoGs can you try to render the scene shared by Matt in the #329 issue to check if this problem is also related the use of .ply files?
# Cornell Box Scene
# Normal view
LookAt 0 56 308
0 35 0
0 1 0
# Zoom in on mirror ball
#LookAt 0 56 308 -23 17 50 0 1 0
#Camera "perspective" "float fov" [10]
# Zoom in on glass ball
#LookAt 0 56 308 23 17 85 0 1 0
#Camera "perspective" "float fov" [10]
#Integrator "whitted"
Integrator "volpath"
#Integrator "photonmap" "float maxdist" [10.0]
Camera "perspective"
"float fov" [ 30 ]
Film "rgb"
"integer yresolution" [ 384 ]
"integer xresolution" [ 512 ]
WorldBegin
AttributeBegin
Translate 0 84.99 85
AreaLightSource "diffuse"
"rgb L" [ 20 20 20 ]
Material "diffuse"
"rgb reflectance" [ 0 0 0 ]
Shape "trianglemesh"
"point3 P" [ -17 0 -17 17 0 -17 17 0 17 -17 0 17 ]
"integer indices" [ 0 1 2 2 3 0 ]
AttributeEnd
AttributeBegin
Material "dielectric"
"float eta" [ 1.5 ]
Translate 23 17 85
Shape "sphere"
"float radius" [ 17 ]
AttributeEnd
AttributeBegin
Material "conductor"
"spectrum k" [ "metal-Ag-k" ]
"spectrum eta" [ "metal-Ag-eta" ]
"float roughness" [ 0 ]
Translate -23 17 50
Shape "sphere"
"float radius" [ 17 ]
AttributeEnd
AttributeBegin
# ceiling
#floor
# back wall
# behind camera wall
# left wall
# right wall
Material "diffuse"
"rgb reflectance" [ 0.85 0.85 0.85 ]
Shape "trianglemesh"
"point3 P" [ -50 85 0 50 85 0 50 85 350 -50 85 350 ]
"integer indices" [ 0 1 2 2 3 0 ]
Shape "trianglemesh"
"point3 P" [ -50 0 0 -50 0 350 50 0 350 50 0 0 ]
"integer indices" [ 0 1 2 2 3 0 ]
Shape "trianglemesh"
"point3 P" [ -50 85 0 -50 0 0 50 0 0 50 85 0 ]
"integer indices" [ 0 1 2 2 3 0 ]
Shape "trianglemesh"
"point3 P" [ -50 85 350 50 85 350 50 0 350 -50 0 350 ]
"integer indices" [ 0 1 2 2 3 0 ]
Material "diffuse"
"rgb reflectance" [ 0.9 0.6 0.6 ]
Shape "trianglemesh"
"point3 P" [ -50 0 0 -50 85 0 -50 85 350 -50 0 350 ]
"integer indices" [ 0 1 2 2 3 0 ]
Material "diffuse"
"rgb reflectance" [ 0.6 0.6 0.9 ]
Shape "trianglemesh"
"point3 P" [ 50 0 350 50 85 350 50 85 0 50 0 0 ]
"integer indices" [ 0 1 2 2 3 0 ]
AttributeEnd
Here this scene is rendered OK with PBRT_FLOAT_AS_DOUBLE=ON
pbrt.exe --log-level "verbose" --log-file c:/apps/pbrt4/debug.txt --gpu --gpu-device 0 --spp 4
Cheers..!
from pbrt-v4.
I tested the scene with the same options --gpu --gpu-device 0 --spp 4
, but strangely, I get these error messages from Optix, The render still remains black in double precision and ok with floats:
Images rendered in both .exr and .png file formats. Nothing changes as the PBRT_DBG messages (L[4] array) still print a null radiance.
Here is the shell output messages when running the double version in release:
( 253, 0, 0) error: encountered an invalid ray:
origin: [nan, nan, nan]
direction: [nan, nan, nan]
tmin: 0.000000
tmax: 1000000015047466219876688855040.000000
rayTime: 0.000000
call location: No source location available. The input PTX may not contain debug information (nvcc option: -lineinfo), OptixModuleCompileOptions::debugLevel set to OPTIX_COMPILE_DEBUG_LEVEL_NONE, or no useful information is present for the current block.
WARNING: additional exceptions ignored
(16293, 0, 0) error: encountered an invalid ray:
(16307, 0, 0) error: encountered an invalid ray:
(16251, 0, 0) error: encountered an invalid ray:
(16210, 0, 0) error: encountered an invalid ray:
(16220, 0, 0) error: encountered an invalid ray:
origin: [nan, nan, nan]
direction: [nan, nan, nan]
tmin: 0.000000
tmax: 1000000015047466219876688855040.000000
rayTime: 0.000000
call location: No source location available. The input PTX may not contain debug information (nvcc option: -lineinfo), OptixModuleCompileOptions::debugLevel set to OPTIX_COMPILE_DEBUG_LEVEL_NONE, or no useful information is present for the current block.
Here is the debug text file (looking just right):
debug.txt
I tested rendering using the --wavefront
option (with both versions). > Test is OK
I then decided to compile the debug version with the OPTIX_COMPILE_DEBUG_LEVEL_FULL debugLevel and run it under the compute-sanitizer. Here are the logs.
Apparently, it seems to be coming from the EvaluateMaterialAndBSDFs kernel.
compute-sanitizer.txt
And then, by running it on the debug version, I get these assertions.
D:\PBRT\src\pbrt/util/vecmath.h:268: block: [12,0,0], thread: [65,0,0] Assertion `!HasNaN()` failed.
D:\PBRT\src\pbrt/util/vecmath.h:268: block: [4,0,0], thread: [34,0,0] Assertion `!HasNaN()` failed.
D:\PBRT\src\pbrt/util/vecmath.h:268: block: [6,0,0], thread: [42,0,0] Assertion `!HasNaN()` failed.
D:\PBRT\src\pbrt/util/vecmath.h:268: block: [4,0,0], thread: [192,0,0] Assertion `!HasNaN()` failed.
D:\PBRT\src\pbrt/util/vecmath.h:268: block: [14,0,0], thread: [64,0,0] Assertion `!HasNaN()` failed.
D:\PBRT\src\pbrt/util/vecmath.h:268: block: [13,0,0], thread: [160,0,0] Assertion `!HasNaN()` failed.
D:\PBRT\src\pbrt/util/vecmath.h:268: block: [20,0,0], thread: [134,0,0] Assertion `!HasNaN()` failed.
D:\PBRT\src\pbrt/util/vecmath.h:268: block: [4,0,0], thread: [69,0,0] Assertion `!HasNaN()` failed.
D:\PBRT\src\pbrt/util/vecmath.h:268: block: [4,0,0], thread: [73,0,0] Assertion `!HasNaN()` failed.
I kept exploring deeper into the code and found that the part giving this strange issue was coming from this chunk of code:
Point3f pc = movingFromCamera.ApplyInverse(Point3f(w.pi));
with pc
giving sometimes overflowed values... Maybe I am totally wrong but I'll try digging further tomorrow evening.
Thanks for the feedback !
from pbrt-v4.
Is possible that you need to review the installed CUDA & Optix combo.. Here i'm using Cuda 11.6 + Optix 7.4
from pbrt-v4.
Ok, I tested Pbrt with CUDA 11.6 and Optix 7.4. I get the same assertions but this time, values are not Nans.
The rendered image is still black but when priting bsdf (using PBRT_DBG_LOGGING), I get correct Conductor/Dielectric BxDf values so that's a progress.
Pc
values however still give overflowed values in the GenerateCameraRays
program.
When printing radiance values from the UpdateFilm method, I still get these null values:
Adding Lw 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 at pixel (24, 182)
Adding Lw 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 at pixel (25, 182)
Adding Lw 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 at pixel (26, 182)
Adding Lw 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 at pixel (27, 182)
Adding Lw 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 at pixel (28, 182)
Adding Lw 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 at pixel (29, 182)
Adding Lw 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 at pixel (30, 182)
Adding Lw 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 at pixel (31, 182)
Result is not being affected by the CUDA Optix combo change, I tried with Optix 7.6 and kept getting these black images. Is there something I'm missing ?
from pbrt-v4.
Interesting... I'm too busy to do more tests, but I'll try it next weekend
from pbrt-v4.
Thank you for your two replies.
I managed to isolate part of the issue in the optix.cu file. When launching the __raygen__findClosest
program, I found that the optixTrace method was always giving missing intersections, thus allowing missed rays to be generated (and then calling the HandleEscapedRays
method).
As a result, I tried rendering the same scene with a default infinite light (by adding this line to the pbrt file):
LightSource "infinite"
Here is the rendered image (EXR converted to png, both spheres can be seen):
(spp1, jitter on wavelengths is active)
@mmp , I modified the triangleArray setup, by using the CUDATracked memory resource to create the pGPU
array and made it leak on purpose. >> It gave me the same render.
Since I'm getting an image from missed rays only, there must be something between the BVH construction and the Optix traversable at runtime.
Still searching... I'll keep you updated :)
from pbrt-v4.
Coming back with some updates !
Apparently, using simple floating point precision Point3f works with a 3080 Ti. I had to reinstall Cuda and Optix from scratch. Plus, it seems to be working with CUDA 11.6 and Optix 7.4 only (haven't found the reason yet as any other combination fails).
However, rendering with a 2060 still gives the previous image. Since, it is working with the 3080, I'll consider it resolved :)
Thanks again for the help !
from pbrt-v4.
I have fixed the code in pbrt/gpu/aggregate.cpp
for PBRT_FLOAT_AS_DOUBLE
in case others run into this...
from pbrt-v4.
Related Issues (20)
- TeX comments in IDE HOT 1
- Potential incorrect mutex usage in ptex cache construction HOT 1
- Equation 14.24 seems missing from the online version of the pbrt-v4 book HOT 1
- Request: support light source definition via IES data HOT 1
- using --pixelstats in conjunction with --outfile do not work as expected
- Specify Volume with Transform and Camera Inside Volume in a Scene File
- PBRT hangs while rendering certain scenes with subsurface materials from a certain sample rate and higher
- Spectral range in SpectralFilm is overruled by constants in spectrum.h
- [Ubuntu] Unable to build TEV; uintptr_t not declared in scope.
- Apple M3 raytracing acceleration HOT 4
- Illegal memory was encountered when mixed textures are used.
- build pbrt in Windows with CUDA errors HOT 3
- Denoiser not being initialized for OptiX 8.0.0
- GPU compiling error with -DPBRT_FLOAT_AS_DOUBLE HOT 1
- Periodic Radiance Values for Spectral Render
- spectrum.h not defined in the pbrt/base
- gpu runs failing: Invalid PTX input HOT 1
- Build issue vs 2022 cuda 12.5 optix 7.7 win 11 HOT 3
- Final image is black when using GPU HOT 2
- GPU rendering not working with MSCV Version 14.40 and newer
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from pbrt-v4.