Comments (1)
This has been requested a lot, so I've finally decided to add a source list to the readme. That said, I am little hesitant about engaging too much with the "you got a source on that?" crowd. Here why:
First, most of this material is trivially googleable, and the things that are not trivial to research are already linked on the website. I provide inline citations already for eleven separate assertions, and only a small minority of easily located statistics are left uncited. For instance, regarding your friends who want to know the annual cost of health care for a family of four. I'm not trying to be rude here, but this is literally what happens when you google that exact phrase:
Very often, someone going "got a source on that?" is not motivated by sincere intellectual curiosity, but is instead already resolved to finding the "flaw" in any source delivered to them. Not everyone is like this of course. In fact some have the exact opposite motivation—they are hoping to bolster an argument they already agree with by fleshing it out with citations. In either case though, nothing is gained by the citation. Those who already agree will not suddenly agree more. Those looking for an argument will never be persuaded by any information, and are not worth engaging.
Second, to the extent that you can find a flaw in some of these numbers, it almost never matters in the larger picture. For instance, in this project I used $24,000 as the annual cost of health care for a family of four. Now, let's suppose that number is WILDLY off base. Here's how the graphic would look with a few different numbers:
Do you see how unimportant this distinction is in context? In some cases, the difference is so small that it's literally physically impossible for certain computer monitors to display it. Even if the number was off by 400%, the overall conclusion is exactly the same: the greatest financial burden in your life, a lifesaving resource inaccessible to millions, is in fact a tiny pebble in a grand ocean of virtually limitless wealth, and it has been denied to you through monstrous greed.
I am reminded here of The Story of Mankind which begins:
High up in the North in the land called Svithjod, there stands a rock. It is a hundred miles high and a hundred miles wide. Once every thousand years a little bird comes to this rock to sharpen its beak. When the rock has thus been worn away, then a single day of eternity will have gone by.
The debate a lot of people seem to want is whether the bird ACTUALLY lands more like once every 920 years. This is such a comical missing of the point that I don't know how I could even converse with a person who thinks that way. Every single number on this page could be wrong by 3x and it wouldn't matter at all. The policy conclusions about taxation and poverty would still be exactly the same. But again, the numbers are not wrong and anything that is even slightly debatable is already cited.
Most of all, I feel these exact number debates are a massive distraction from the central thesis. Billionaire defenders will criticize any number I give no matter how rigorously I arrived at it, hoping to discredit the whole project. Supporters will spend all of their energy trying prove the number is true. This could not be further from the conversation I want surrounding this project. Hundreds of thousands of children die each year shivering in a puddle of their own diarrhea, and the superwealthy could effortlessly wipe this evil from the earth. Let's talk about that. I say it would cost three percent of superwealth. Could it be six percent? Sure. Would that change anything? Of course not.
from 1-pixel-wealth.
Related Issues (20)
- Open to sponsorship? HOT 1
- 80% vanishing point HOT 1
- Add Farsi translation HOT 1
- Turkish Translation HOT 2
- Polish translation HOT 3
- typo HOT 1
- What about finite resources? HOT 1
- Very hard to navigate with horizontal scrolling HOT 2
- Zuckerberg vs. $200M visual is unclear HOT 2
- No mention of how this wealth could help stop the climate crisis
- Translation/localisation for Austria/Europe HOT 1
- Directing towards a resistant audience. HOT 1
- 2022 update with Elon Musk HOT 1
- endowment payout rule outdated link HOT 2
- added translation button on site for Spanish, English, and French languages HOT 4
- Dead link HOT 5
- Love! Support! Anachy mother love her sons!
- Chinese Localisation 中文汉化版 HOT 1
- Action Items HOT 1
- Slovak translation finished HOT 1
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from 1-pixel-wealth.