[Discussion] Consider ESM-only for v5? about is-what HOT 2 OPEN

@mesqueeb I've been working on various things all-at-once in the https://github.com/mesqueeb/is-what/tree/jcbhmr branch. Just thought I'd let you know. 😊 I hope to be able to break that branch into multiple "feature-ish" PRs to be considered somewhat independently.

https://github.com/mesqueeb/is-what/tree/jcbhmr does these things:

1. Split index.ts into multiple files
2. Add a bunch of documentation for some of the functions (still have more to do)
3. Remove useless "isMap() detects if the value is a Map" comments
4. Remove redundant JSDoc @param declarations (already typed by TS)
5. Remove dist/ from source control
6. Automate deployments to https://deno.land/x/is_what via tags on a separate build branch #53
7. Improve separation of concerns with publishing workflows #40
8. Add a docs preview action to give a .zip of what would be deployed
9. Add more tests (a LOT more tests)
10. OPINION/OPTIONAL: Reset to default Prettier configuration. Defaults are good. I like defaults.
11. Put prettier in package.json (before I eventually removed it and used the defaults)
12. Add a JSDoc prettier plugin #45
13. Add a JSDoc package.json plugin #45
14. Add TSX as a dev dep #44
15. Use node --test and node:test for test running #44
16. Add a prettier pre-format hook
17. DISCOURAGE local npm publish by removing the np helper #40
18. Use plain tsc instead of rollup #44
19. ONLY provide .js (no .cjs) for ESM-only package #47 #37
20. Revamp readme to shift docs to the docs website (it's shorter)
21. Improve readme with images
22. Remove .github/FUNDING.yml with the expectation that it will be moved to mesqueeb/.github

any probably more stuff to come! Bear in mind that this https://github.com/mesqueeb/is-what/tree/jcbhmr WILL NOT BE MERGED INTO MAIN but instead is my "playground" 🪀 that I want to show off and get feedback on 😊

from is-what.

Don't run too fast because it'll be harder to communicate about how we feel about each change 😅

Discussion regarding to the last post's todos can be continued here: #57
→ Do you want me to address each of your todos with my opinion?

Discussion regarding to the ESM only can be continued here: #55

from is-what.