[BUG] Validation of `sh:path` with `sh:alternativePath` not working per the SHACL spec about rdfsharp HOT 4 CLOSED

I'm also adding "sh:path (prop1 prop2)" which I saw is the sequential form of paths.

Other variants can't be supported (like the ones stating cardinality with "+" or "*") because unfortunately our algebra is not capable of computing them neither in SPARQL. But, at least, with your support our SHACL engine has improved nicely :)

Thanks and regards,
Marco

from rdfsharp.

Hi Henrik,
thanks for the report (precise as usual).

I'm working on this to add support for "sh:alternativePath" syntax and will let you know here the progress.

Regards,
Marco

from rdfsharp.

Hi Henrik,
I merged the work for proper detection and handling of "sh:path" declared with "sh:alternativePath", which should allow you to successfully deal with this use case. It was my glitch (again) to not know this kind of syntax.

Expect a new release containing also this feature in the next days.

Thanks again and regards,
Marco

from rdfsharp.

Hi Marco!

No problems here! Thanks a bunch for adding the fix :)

Best regards,
Henrik

from rdfsharp.