Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (5)

max-mapper avatar max-mapper commented on July 23, 2024

concat-stream isn't a readable stream, just a writable one. you can do this though:

process.stdin
    .pipe(concat(function(buff) {
       process.stdout.write(buff)
    }))

from concat-stream.

karellm avatar karellm commented on July 23, 2024

Is there a reason why concat-stream isn't readable? I would really benefit from that, instead of having to create a new readable from the output.

from concat-stream.

max-mapper avatar max-mapper commented on July 23, 2024

Yea, concat stream is the end-of-the-line for streaming data. It wouldn't
make sense to pipe it somewhere as it would only emit a single buffer,
hence the single callback API. Streams are for when you have a series of
chunks

On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Karel Ledru-Mathé [email protected]
wrote:

Is there a reason why concat-stream isn't readable? I would really
benefit from that, instead of having to create a new readable from the
output.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/maxogden/concat-stream/issues/20#issuecomment-36062251
.

from concat-stream.

karellm avatar karellm commented on July 23, 2024

I understand your point. I guess it makes sense it most cases. Though here is my use case (I am new to streams).

I am writing a parser that extract pieces of informations recursively in all the files within a folder (and subfolders). Once all is parsed, I use concat-stream to merge all the information in a single array.

Now let's say I want to create a gulp plugin out of this. I should return a stream so other plugin could pipe into my plugin. Right now, I should 'hack' it in the final callback.

from concat-stream.

raine avatar raine commented on July 23, 2024

I think being able to pipe the result of concat stream would make it more "composable". I actually have an use case where I want to either concat a stream into one big array or emit the chunks one at a time to another stream. Callback being the only API makes that a bit difficult.

update

Workaround I came up with.

stream-reduce = require 'stream-reduce'

# append :: a → [a] → [a]
{append, flip} = require 'ramda'
concat-stream = stream-reduce flip(append), []

stream
    .pipe concat-stream
    .on \data ->
        # data [1,2]

stream.push 1
stream.push 2
stream.push null

from concat-stream.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.