Why use this instead of underscore.js? about lodash HOT 6 CLOSED

First paragraph in the README (emphasis mine):

A drop-in replacement for Underscore.js, from the devs behind jsPerf.com, that delivers performance improvements, bug fixes, and additional features.

Additionally, Lo-Dash allows you to create custom builds, containing only the methods that you need for a specific project. This keeps the file size to a minimum (which is another aspect of performance).

from lodash.

Thanks for the quick response. I appreciate your willingness to have a conversation about this, since it really isn't a 'bug' or an 'issue'.

I thought I saw something about additional methods that are not in underscore.js ? Can you list or reference any new methods that are not in underscore.js?

What about the bug fixes? Can you state which underscore.js methods have bugs and what the nature of the bug is?

from lodash.

I thought I saw something about additional methods that are not in underscore.js ? Can you list or reference any new methods that are not in underscore.js?

You’re thinking of the “additional features” part: https://github.com/bestiejs/lodash#features

from lodash.

What about the bug fixes? Can you state which underscore.js methods have bugs and what the nature of the bug is?

See https://github.com/bestiejs/lodash#closed-underscorejs-issues (maybe I should rename that section, I was on the fence about it).

from lodash.

@tcaddy If you have suggestions on section order or wording just let us know.

from lodash.

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

from lodash.