Comments (2)
timber, and thus forests, were crucial to European states for all sorts of construction or energy (firewood); this one function of trees (and other plant life) came to blur out all others (including roles in ecosystems but also things like fruit, ritual/worship, etc):
In state "fiscal forestry," however, the actual tree with its vast number of possible uses was replaced by an abstract tree representing a volume of lumber or firewood.
...
The forest as a habitat disappears and is replaced by the forest as an economic resource to be managed efficiently and profitably.
even the language used reflects this, categorizing the natural world according to economic value:
Thus, plants that are valued become "crops," the species that compete with them are stigmatized as "weeds," and the insects that ingest them are stigmatized as "pests." Thus, trees that are valued become "timber," while species that compete with them become "trash" trees or "underbrush".
Scientific forestry was originally developed as part of a broader effort of "cameral science", "an effort to reduce the fiscal management of a kingdom to scientific principles that would allow systematic planning."
It involved systematically tallying trees and mathematically estimating their yields, generating an abstracted forest in the form of a spreadsheet. The forest was then grown and managed in such a way to facilitate this measuring and calculation process - they were planted in neat rows and underbrush was regularly cleared, making the forests easy to systematically count, chop down, etc. All together this is the process of making the forest "legible", i.e. applying a structure/regimentation to make it more amenable to these kinds of abstract representations, analyses, and experimentation, as well as stabilizing it to make it's output more reliable/predictable (well, not entirely).
People living nearby still tried to use these regimented forests as they used the forests prior (grazing animals, poaching firewood, etc) and natural forces such as blights, storms, insect populations, etc continued to affect them. So these forests were never entirely regimented.
Forests are typically composed of multiple species "but the commercial profits from the first rotation [of Norway spruce] were so stunning that there was little effort to return to mixed forests." So future plantings were monocrops, ruining these forests for the nearby people that still used them for grazing and so on.
At first it was a huge success, very high yields and so on, but "As we shall see with urban planning, revolutionary theory, collectivization, and rural resettlement, a whole world lying 'outside the brackets' returned to haunt this technical vision."
Over time the negative effects showed - "the whole nutrient cycle got out of order and eventually was nearly stopped....This represents a production loss of 20 to 30 percent."
An exceptionally complex process involving soil building, nutriet uptake, and symbiotic relations among fungi, insects, mammals, and flora...was apparently disrupted, with serious consequences. Most of these consequences can be traced to the radical simplicity of the scientific forest.
(the following paragraph goes into a lot more detail)The metaphorical value of this brief account of scientific production forestry is that it illustrates the dangers of dismembering an exceptionally complex and poorly understood set of relations and processes in order to isolate a single element of instrumental value.
Monocultures are, as a rule, more fragile and hence more vulnerable to the stress of disease and weather than polycultures are. ... A diverse, complex forest, however...is far more resilient....Its very diversity and complexity help to inoculate it against devastation"
If the natural world, however shaped by human use, is too unwieldy in its "raw" form for administrative manipulation, so too are the actual social patterns of human interaction with nature bureaucratically indigestible in their raw form. No administrative system is capable of representing any existing social community except through a heroic and greatly schematized process of abstraction and simplification. It is not simply a question of capacity, although, like a forest, a human community is surely far too complicated and variable to easily yield its secrets to bureaucratic formulae. It is also a question of purpose. State agents have no interest--nor should they--in describing an entire social reality, any more than the scientific forester has an interest in describing the ecology of a forest in detail. Their abstractions and simplifications are disciplined by a small number of objectives"
from cybernetics-club.
Seeing Like a State, chapter 1, James C. Scott, analysis of the authoritarian approach to complex problems
...
"I'm only realizing now that the Seeing Like a State reading should just be up to page 25, not the whole first chapter...I was mainly interested in the part on scientific forestry!"
---
narrowing of vision
...helps certain forms of knowledge and control, by bringing into focus
certain limited aspects of an otherwise complex and unwieldy
reality.
combined with various other simplifications/abstractions/narrowings,
"an overall, aggregate, synoptic view of a selective reality
is achieved, making possible a high degree of schematic
knowledge, control, and manipulation"
scientific forestry
...serves as a demonstration of the value of this narrowing of vision
invented in late eighteenth-century prussia & saxony
"used <in this paper> as a metaphor for the forms of knowledge
and manipulation characteristic of powerful institutions with
sharply defined interests, of which state bureaucracies and
large commercial firms are per haps the outstanding examples"
"Once we have seen how simplification, legibility, and manipulation
operate in forest management, we can then explore how the modern
state applies a similar lens to urban planning, rural settlement,
land administration, and agriculture"
history of forestry
early modern european states viewed forests primarily through the fiscal
lens of revenue needs. "Exaggerating only slightly, one might
say that the crown’s interest in forests was resolved through
its fiscal lens into a single number: the revenue yield of the
timber that might be extracted annually."
...
trees could be interpreted so many ways, but "In state “fiscal
forestry,”however, the actual tree with its vast number of
possible uses was replaced by an abstract tree representing a
volume of lumber or firewood. If the princely conception of the
forest was still utilitarian, it was surely a utilitarianism
confined to the direct needs of the state."
...
"From a naturalist's perspective, nearly everything was missing
from the state's narrow frame of reference.", and "From an
anthropologist's perspective, nearly everything touching on
human interaction with the forest was also missing from the state's
tunnel vision."
"utilitarian discourse replaces the term "nature" with the term "natural
resources"", "plants that are valued become "crops", the species
that compete with them are stigmatized as "weeds" and the insects
that ingest them are stignamtized as "pests"", etc...
so... these things were happening with other fields, but forests
in particular allowed their abstractions to shape our very
conceptions of forests, the author claims.
there used to be a primitive attempt at forestry; just split them into
equal plots where the number of plots represented the number of
years in the assumed growth cycle. then stagger the plots one
year apart and harvest one plot at a time. this yielded poor
harvests because of poor maps, uneven distribution of the most
valuable large trees.
at some point, some dude becmann precisely measured some forests by tagging
them with color-coded nails by size. then some mathematicians
derived a formula for amount of usable wood for a given size class.
by reducing the forest into these numbers, the foreter had a view
of the entire forest.
over time, the forests began to be grown in very regimented ways
too, in lines, with no underbrush. "Although the geometric, uniform
forest was intended to facilitate management and extraction,
it quickly became a powerful aesthetic as well"
this cleanup also helped knowledge transfer as relatively unskilled ppl could
follow written instructions to grow and maintain these plots. something
like "beaurocracy and $$$ uniting"
however, "The monocropped forest was a disaster for peasants
who were now deprived of all the grazing, food, raw materials,
and medicines that the earlier forest ecology had af forded."
"The great simplification of the forest into a "one-commodity
machine" was precisely the step that allowed German forestry
science to become a rigorous technical and commercial discipline
that could be codified and taught. A condition of its rigor was
that it severely bracketed, or assumed to be constant, all
variables except those bearing di rectly on the yield of the
selected species and on the cost of growing and extracting them.
As we shall see with urban planning, revolutionary theory,
collectivization, and rural resettlement, a whole world lying
“outside the brackets" returned to haunt this technical vision."
but... after one rotation of confiers, shit went bad. the nutrient cycle
got outta wack, and "Waldsterben" (forest death) entered the german
vocabulary.
"Utilitarian simplification in the forest was an effective way
of maximizing wood production in the short and intermediate
term. Ultimately, however, its emphasis on yield and paper profits,
its relatively short time horizon, and, above all, the vast
array of consequences it had res olutely bracketed came back
to haunt it."
"the consequences of not seeing the forest for the trees sooner or
later became glaring. Many were directly traceable to the basic
simplification imposed in the interest of ease of management
and economic return: monoculture. Monocultures are, as a rule,
more fragile and hence more vulnerable to the stress of disease
and weather than polycultures are"
social facts, raw and cooked
"The administrators' forest cannot be the naturalists’forest.
Even if the ecological interactions at play in the forest were
known, they would constitute a reality so complex and variegated
as to defy easy shorthand description. The intellectual filter
necessary to reduce the complexity to manageable dimensions
was provided by the state’s interest in commercial timber and
revenue."
"If the natural world, however shaped by human use, is too uwieldy
in its "raw” form for administrative manipulation, so
too are the actual social patterns of human interaction with
nature bureaucratically indigestible in their raw form"
summary
abstract the natural world to understand it better and to teach it to others,
and to profit from it
(but, these abstractions will fail if they are not maintained over time, it
seems)
from cybernetics-club.
Related Issues (15)
- [S3 Discussion] The Cybersyn Revolution HOT 6
- [S3 Discussion] Fuller's "World Game" HOT 4
- [S5 Planning] Games HOT 8
- [Group Branching] Instantiate a Pittsburgh CC?
- Future session ideas HOT 12
- 6A: Cybernetics And Me HOT 5
- Films/videos HOT 3
- Cybernetics and the Alt-Right??? Ideas HOT 4
- time/location? HOT 2
- Suggestions for Session 3 HOT 5
- [S3 Discussion] Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning HOT 3
- [S3 Discussion] Social Traps HOT 2
- [S3 Discussion] Anekāntavāda HOT 6
- [S3 Discussion] Navigating Neoliberalism HOT 4
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from cybernetics-club.