Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (3)

inkredabull avatar inkredabull commented on August 10, 2024

+1

I hit a situation where 'init' in requirejs.yml would have been helpful.

We're using MooTools and jQuery, so we pull in both via requirejs. In addition, we pull in a 3rd AMD'd file for setting up jQuery noConflict, but in case that doesn't get loaded or loaded in the incorrect order, and jQuery gets loaded after MooTools, jQuery retakes/clobbers $.

Would be nice to, on 'init' of jQuery via requirejs, setup the noConflict.

from requirejs-rails.

sgentile avatar sgentile commented on August 10, 2024

Personally, I would rather use it just how it is described on the website in javascript. I find trying to 'translate' everything there, which is documented very well, into a another format, which isn't - just adds to complexity and obscurity.

ie. you are saying a con is 'complicated' - but I have no idea that your yaml solution wants and found that more complicated than just reading the documentation on requirejs site. And then if it doesn't support shim for example as you mention, it adds even more complication because devs will be wondering why it just doesn't work.

And the pro definitely is a feature I'd like to see (This will handle more complex RequireJS configurations)

"Cons: More complicated implementation. Not backward compatible. Compatibility issues could be mitigated by adding a deprecation warning and accepting both YAML and JS configuration files for a limited number of pre-1.0 releases."

from requirejs-rails.

jwhitley avatar jwhitley commented on August 10, 2024

"Complicated" means complicated to implement, of course. A stock requirejs configuration is not JSON, which is normally easily handled in most modern languages. It's full-on Javascript, albeit a limited structure, which still requires a full Javascript parser implemented in Ruby. Dealing with JSON or YAML in most dynamic languages is trivial, as they map cleanly to native datastructures. Switching to a parser means that validation, inspection, transformation, then reserialization all must happen via a parser-specific AST.

But all that aside, the YAML approach was great for quickly getting to a usable state but is just as clearly not the way forward as my notes on other issues have stated.

from requirejs-rails.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.