Way to emit events in test code that is compatible with propagating-hammerjs about propagating-hammerjs HOT 4 CLOSED

The closer to hammer.js the better. Best would be if this library wouldn't be necessary at all ;).

This is an interesting case, so far I hadn't used emit and therefore didn't encounter this issue. I think this problem boils down to the internal property _firstTarget not being set in case of an event fired via emit.

I've added some code overriding hammers emit event, see ff7b6a7. Can you check whether this solves the issue?

from propagating-hammerjs.

Yes. That fix allowed me to remove the extra emit() in my tests.

btw, I was using emit in my tests because that's what I saw you doing in your tests. Is this the best way for me to be testing my app's use of hammerjs? I manually create an event object that is an ordinary javascript object (not an Event) and fill in the details that hammerjs uses. But this required some trial an error, and inspection of hammerjs's source code to get working. It's also probably rather brittle. It's also not easy to simulate more elaborate gestures.

Is there a better way to do this? Does hammerjs expose an interface (other than emit) that works well for simulating events during tests?

from propagating-hammerjs.

Ok great that it works.

I'm not sure which tests you mean, at least propagating-hammerjs doesn't have tests (sorry for that).

from propagating-hammerjs.

I don't know what is the preferred way to test touch events with hammer. I suppose the "right" way is to create real DOM events and fire them via real DOM event handlers attached to real DOM elements. But that's not so trivial.

from propagating-hammerjs.