Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (3)

AndreWeiner avatar AndreWeiner commented on June 12, 2024

Hi Jihoo,
thanks for the update. Could you show some visualizations of your results?
Best, Andre

from data_driven_wall_modeling.

JihooKang-KOR avatar JihooKang-KOR commented on June 12, 2024

Dear @AndreWeiner,

Please see the figure as follows:
image

The simulation was executed until 500th step for y+ = 50 and 100. As shown in the figure, the profile is already out of the range (exceeds 0.006). If the simulation kept going on, it would crash.

Therefore, I didn't try the full simulation for the 2D mapping model.

Best regards,
Jihoo Kang

from data_driven_wall_modeling.

JihooKang-KOR avatar JihooKang-KOR commented on June 12, 2024

Dear @AndreWeiner,

I realized that the 2D mapping model was wrongly set. Therefore, I changed the feature setting for wall as follows:

  1. Wall slope model
    a. features : x-coordinates, y-coordinates at faces, integral average Ux, Ux at 1st face
    b. label : wall slope
  2. Face slope model
    a. features : x-coordinates, y-coordinates at faces, integral average Ux
    b. label : face slope

I trained these two models with 5000 epochs, and the notebook can be found in the same location of the cloud folder.

The result Cf is given by:
image

The simulation crashed, and the Cf values couldn't capture the proper behavior as above. It seems to be okay in the middle of the plate, but magGradUf is too small which leads to very high nuEff at the 1st face. If we see the csv files in the simulation folder (turbulentFlatPlate_2Dmodel/yplus_100 or yplus_50), the phenomenon is basically the same with the 1D mapping model. It means that the face slopes by the ML model becomes greater than the magGradUf after a certain time step (within 7~8th step).

Hence, I concluded that the slopes at the wall and the faces from the 1D mapping model have reasonable values compared to the 2D mapping model although they are not exactly the same.

In the cloud folder, I updated what I did, and thus the folder locations are the same as before.

I hope there would be another idea to alleviate this problem like Issue #2.

Best regards,
Jihoo Kang

from data_driven_wall_modeling.

Related Issues (3)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.