Release jclouds-1.6.0 about legacy-jclouds HOT 36 CLOSED

staging repository for jclouds/jclouds closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-878/

from legacy-jclouds.

tested with compute-basics, blobstore-basics, denominator (which tested 4 of our dns providers)

from legacy-jclouds.

per @everett-toews the rax example SmokeTest runs 100%.

from legacy-jclouds.

released and pushed tags

from legacy-jclouds.

NEXT STEP:
start releasing downstream repos

from legacy-jclouds.

jclouds/jclouds in central y'all http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cjclouds

from legacy-jclouds.

staging repository for jclouds/jclouds-labs closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-893/

from legacy-jclouds.

staging repository for jclouds/jclouds-chef closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-895/

from legacy-jclouds.

if anyone with access can verify the above repos in EU-time go ahead and release them.

from legacy-jclouds.

jclouds-labs has been built, using jclouds.version=1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. In some
cases this produces invalid OSGi metadata.
I think that for now it breaks the joyent-cloudapi for jclouds-karaf, but
its possible it breaks other stuff too.

Ideally, we could recut jclouds-labs. If not we could just exclude the
broken features from jclouds-karaf.

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Adrian Cole [email protected]:

if anyone with access can verify the above repos in EU-time go ahead and
release them.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17128094
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

from legacy-jclouds.

No problem. Ill recut it.

On Sunday, April 28, 2013, Ioannis Canellos wrote:

jclouds-labs has been built, using jclouds.version=1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. In some
cases this produces invalid OSGi metadata.
I think that for now it breaks the joyent-cloudapi for jclouds-karaf, but
its possible it breaks other stuff too.

Ideally, we could recut jclouds-labs. If not we could just exclude the
broken features from jclouds-karaf.

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>>wrote:

if anyone with access can verify the above repos in EU-time go ahead and
release them.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17128094>
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17133936
.

from legacy-jclouds.

there are still a number of problems in the jclouds-labs pom, some of which were addressed, yet didn't survive the nit storm on jclouds/jclouds-labs#27. I will spend up to an hour fixing these poms again starting.. now.

from legacy-jclouds.

eventhough i am fixing the labs poms, please do remove labs from karaf.

Karaf will likely go into ASF and it shouldn't have strict deps on things
that are in labs. As discussed prior, not all things in labs will make the
cut, so we should be conservative.

On Sunday, April 28, 2013, Ioannis Canellos wrote:

jclouds-labs has been built, using jclouds.version=1.6.0-SNAPSHOT. In some
cases this produces invalid OSGi metadata.
I think that for now it breaks the joyent-cloudapi for jclouds-karaf, but
its possible it breaks other stuff too.

Ideally, we could recut jclouds-labs. If not we could just exclude the
broken features from jclouds-karaf.

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>>wrote:

if anyone with access can verify the above repos in EU-time go ahead and
release them.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17128094>
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17133936
.

from legacy-jclouds.

I'm working on fixing the karaf features, which are pretty badly broken. In the mean time, can someone please +1 the following?

jclouds/jclouds-labs#86
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-chef/pull/83

from legacy-jclouds.

new staging repository for jclouds/jclouds-chef closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-941/

from legacy-jclouds.

whoops, forgot labs openstack poms. can someone +1 jclouds/jclouds-labs#87

from legacy-jclouds.

new staging repository for jclouds/jclouds-labs closed: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-944/

from legacy-jclouds.

labs and chef repos verified with Abiquo and Hosted Chef

from legacy-jclouds.

released repos and pushed tags for labs and chef

from legacy-jclouds.

test results posted: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds.github.com/blob/master/documentation/releasenotes/1.6-tests.md

next steps: release karaf, cli; write release notes

from legacy-jclouds.

here's a much more simplified version of release notes. please give feedback as soon as you can:

jclouds/legacy-jclouds.github.com#137

from legacy-jclouds.

all components except karaf, cli are in maven central

from legacy-jclouds.

blog http://blog.jclouds.org

from legacy-jclouds.

examples updated thx to @abayer jclouds/jclouds-examples#34

from legacy-jclouds.

conceding eventual consistency on karaf and cli, this was the most efficient jclouds release I can remember. Thanks for the help folks!

from legacy-jclouds.

jclouds-karaf: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-980/

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Adrian Cole [email protected]:

conceding eventual consistency on karaf and cli, this was the most
efficient jclouds release I can remember. Thanks for the help folks!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17147599
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

from legacy-jclouds.

jclouds-cli: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-984/

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ioannis Canellos [email protected]:

jclouds-karaf:
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgjclouds-980/

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Adrian Cole [email protected]:

conceding eventual consistency on karaf and cli, this was the most
efficient jclouds release I can remember. Thanks for the help folks!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17147599
.

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

Ioannis Canellos
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

from legacy-jclouds.

@adriancole I can't seem to find a separate issue for the labs release - in that case, can we close jclouds/jclouds-labs#76, jclouds/jclouds-labs#57 and jclouds/jclouds-labs#46?

Also, it looks like the labs aggregator POM is still pointing to jclouds.version 1.6.0 - is that intentional or should that be bumped up to 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT to match the jclouds 1.6.x branch?

from legacy-jclouds.

@demobox yeah the version should be bumped and there was no labs release
issue

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Andrew Phillips
[email protected]:

@adriancole https://github.com/adriancole I can't seem to find a
separate issue for the labs release - in that case, can we close
jclouds/jclouds-labs#76jclouds/jclouds-labs#76,
jclouds/jclouds-labs#57https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/issues/57and
jclouds/jclouds-labs#46jclouds/jclouds-labs#46
?

Also, it looks like the labs aggregator POMhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/1.6.x/pom.xml#L43is still pointing to
jclouds.version 1.6.0 - is that intentional or should that be bumped up
to 1.6.1-SNAPSHOT to match the jclouds 1.6.x branchhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/1.6.x/project/pom.xml#L31
?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17167366
.

from legacy-jclouds.

@demobox yeah the version should be bumped and there was no labs release issue

jclouds/jclouds-labs#95

from legacy-jclouds.

@adriancole Good to close the open labs release issues for rc.3, 4 and 5?

from legacy-jclouds.

Yes

On Monday, April 29, 2013, Andrew Phillips wrote:

@adriancole https://github.com/adriancole Good to close the open labs
release issues for rc.3, 4 and 5?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17171416
.

from legacy-jclouds.

tested cli by destroying some nodes I left running; released the karaf and cli repos.

@iocanel can you push tags when you get a chance?

from legacy-jclouds.

Kara and CLI in Maven Central. Thanks, @iocanel !

@adriancole CLI and Karaf tags pushed. Good to close this issue?

from legacy-jclouds.

aye cap'n

On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Andrew Phillips [email protected]:

Karahttp://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jclouds/karaf/jclouds-karaf/1.6.0/and
CLI http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/jclouds/cli/jclouds-cli/ in Maven
Central. Thanks, @iocanel https://github.com/iocanel !

@adriancole https://github.com/adriancole CLIhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/commits/jclouds-cli-1.6.0and
Karaf https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/tree/jclouds-karaf-1.6.0tags pushed. Good to close this issue?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/issues/1564#issuecomment-17517454
.

from legacy-jclouds.

Goodbye GitHub issues! Thanks for fun times!

from legacy-jclouds.