Is this intentional behavior? about bezier-easing HOT 5 CLOSED

This means that currentSample cannot be 9 (after --currentSample)

var kSplineTableSize = 11;
var currentSample = 1;
var lastSample = kSplineTableSize - 1;

for (; currentSample !== lastSample; ++currentSample) {
}
--currentSample;

console.log(currentSample)

=> 9

from bezier-easing.

Oh, now that I think about it, that only means that the loop cannot increase intervalStart to 1, and doesn't affect currentSample in that way. My bad.

from bezier-easing.

It only runs for [1, 9] but still increases currentSample from 1 to 10 even if it doesn't run on 10

from bezier-easing.

yes ;) that code might deserve rewriting because is not so readable.

from bezier-easing.

Meh, I should have caught that. I for some reason thought that the check statement would keep the iterator from incrementing one last time. I ran a test in C++ real quick on my computer and it ran [1, 9] which seemed to validate my claim, but I didn't print to console what the iterator was right after the for loop because I assumed it would just be the last value. I thought about it in the wrong order.

from bezier-easing.