Comments (21)
I already did my bit, please guys discuss!
from jschan.
sorry. i was running around on other things.
I'm wondering if we shouldn't represent this as a duplex stream?
from jschan.
In theory I'm ok, but I can't see how.
from jschan.
There's many libs around, i think dominic had his hand in some of them too.
https://github.com/dominictarr/stream-spec#duplex
I'll read up this weekend.
from jschan.
I didn't express me well, sorry. It's not how in code (I wrote ton of
stream code myself), it's how we can match something we write to something
we read from the duplex stream.
from jschan.
I've recently stumbled upon oban, an HTTP router based on highland. I think this is what @Vertice would love for Graft. The question is: would we use that approach also for jschan, or we try to loosely follow libchan's API?
from jschan.
I saw oban too! I've added it to the pitch/inspiration document.
I think jschan needs to stay as close to the official API as possible, and be something we can build something that is more accessible and amenable to general usage.
In my mind, the difference in scope of jschan and graft is similar to the split between http and express.js. jschan is how things talk, graft is how you tell them what to say.
virtualized streams
Gulp's API is also more of an inspiration than Highland, but I think they share important properties that might be good for jschan.
The vinyl virtual format seems like a powerful abstraction to deal with the embedded channels in jschan,
and I suspect useful to get as close to the official API as possible.
being asynchronous pattern agnostic
Both Gulp and Highland allow you to use streams, callbacks, promises and (i think) es6 generators independently in their stream processing functions This should mean easier integration into existing codebases.
from jschan.
I did some more research into how libchan works, and here it is from the protocol docs:
A channel is uni-directional: messages can only flow in one direction. So channels are more similar to pipes than to sockets.
I would say that we can send a Message through a channel, but we will get the answer through the Message itself, like so:
var jschan = require('jschan')
, chan = jschan.memChan()
, msg = jschan.msg({ some: data })
msg.on('response', function(res) {
// do something
})
chan.write(msg)
from jschan.
That seems to be sufficient to get here:
jschan({some: data}) // send message
.pipe(responseHandler) // can return another stream
from jschan.
@Vertice I don't get how the client can receive a response using the above pattern.
from jschan.
Sorry about that, it's too tiny a snippet of code to see anything from.
I think that the abstraction you had about using the messages as response objects is great, and it starts to make me see what a graft layer could look like.
I think you should go with that for now, and we can iterate on top of that. There are some questions I wanted to ask you tho, so could we jump on skype?
from jschan.
i really like the message.on(‘response’) pattern because I think you could build a convincing stream wrapper around it.
my current mental model
The code snippet I showed above is how I am making use of mikael's request.
request.get(‘http://example.com:3000’, {json:myObject})
.pipe(fs.createWriteStream('./filename.ext'));
This has the companion pattern on the server side, where you have to do:
http.createServer().listen(3000);
The libchan model
This breaks in the libchan model, because the pipes are unidirectional, and there's no way to actually respond to a request.
Instead what I think needs to happen, is that each request() will have to do a listen() of it's own, using the msg identifier.
So the pseudocode looks (a little bit at least) like this in my mind:
function request(args.,., cb) {
var msg = createServer(channel)
// set up args, etc.
msg.listen(channel); // assigns id
channel.send(msg, function(msg) {
cb(msg);
});
return msg;
}
Can you set up the in/out to different channels? Or have multiple channels acting concurrently?
from jschan.
Wait, a channel is unidirectional but the server can send a reply through. All is handled by libchan through SPDY stream identifiers.
We'll see what I came up with when I start implemting #4.
from jschan.
Their interface changed somehow: docker/libchan#38.
I have to get through it to grasp it fully.
from jschan.
My updated proposal:
var jschan = require('jschan');
var session = jschan.memorySession();
session.on('channel', function server(chan) {
chan.on('request', function(req) {
req.reply(req.data)
})
})
function client() {
var chan = session.sendChannel();
var msg = jschan.msg({ hello: 'world' });
msg.on('response', function(res) {
console.log('response', res.data);
});
chan.send(msg);
}
client();
from jschan.
I've pushed a very basic implementation of my example above only in memory 👯.
Tomorrow I'll add some unit tests, and maybe the SPDY transport.
@rjrodger do you have an opinion on this interface?
@pelger @Vertice may I have the rights to push to NPM?
from jschan.
I understood libchan better, and I think I might have made some mistakes in the porting of the API. I'll update ASAP.
from jschan.
from jschan.
var jschan = require('jschan');
var session = jschan.memorySession();
session.on('channel', function server(chan) {
chan.on('data', function(msg) {
var returnChannel = msg.returnChannel;
returnChannel.write({ hello: 'write' });
})
})
function client() {
var chan = session.sendChannel();
var ret = chan.createSubChannel('in');
ret.on('data', function(res) {
console.log('response', res);
});
chan.write({ returnChannel: ret });
}
client();
Here was the inspiration of this:
https://github.com/dmcgowan/libchan/blob/fd5134755a480d1238549a44d358549ca03f6ba9/http2/session_test.go#L36-L44
from jschan.
I updated the current API to match this, as the PROTOCOL is fixed.
from jschan.
Closing as it's done in current master.
from jschan.
Related Issues (20)
- .travis.yml
- msgpack implementation HOT 4
- spdy transport HOT 1
- Unix transport HOT 3
- Performance Analysis HOT 4
- Only first frame sent for large objects.
- remove async dependency HOT 2
- Create channels from the global jsChan object HOT 2
- Passing Channels between Sessions HOT 3
- rename create*Channel to *Channel and createByteStream to byteStream HOT 1
- spdy over websocket support HOT 3
- Automatic object stream piping HOT 5
- webrtc transport HOT 6
- Echoed embedded channels break pipes HOT 3
- Rexec example: Golang server does not work with jsChan client HOT 2
- end and finish event not firing via SPDY HOT 3
- TCP Transport ? HOT 2
- protocol error w/ io.js 2.40 HOT 6
- Backpressure problem in stream session HOT 1
- Jschan Compatible with node 4.8.3 ? HOT 1
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from jschan.