[com.google.fonts/check/article/images] should pass if there is not an `article/images` dir about fontbakery HOT 5 CLOSED

@vv-monsalve I agree. I've never seen a sub-dir called "images". What would that include, having another sub-folder for GIFS? videos?
I think we'd be complicating the process and it would actually require too many changes for something that I think works very well.

from fontbakery.

It is just a WARN... for the sake of moving the repo towards some more homogeneous structure.

• How many outliers do we actually have?
• How hard would it be to reorganize the entire repo at once, moving all images to their respective images sub-dirs and afterwards making it mandatory?

I'd say there's some benefit for tooling and for user-friendliness to have a more regular directory structure.

from fontbakery.

It is just a WARN... for the sake of moving the repo towards some more homogeneous structure.

* How many outliers do we actually have?

* How hard would it be to reorganize the entire repo at once, moving all images to their respective `images` sub-dirs and afterwards making it mandatory?

I'd say there's some benefit for tooling and for user-friendliness to have a more regular directory structure.

@nathan-williams, I'd be glad to hear your thoughts here as well. What do you think?

from fontbakery.

• How many outliers do we actually have?

We are not currently using an "images" folder, so having it would be kind of the outlier

How hard would it be to reorganize the entire repo at once

It would require changing the paths in multiple HTML article files, which would be time-consuming on something that is not a strong requirement or need.

@emmamarichal, @m4rc1e, @yanone wdyt?

from fontbakery.

ok, no worries. I'll make the proposed change, then.

from fontbakery.