Ability to use registered signal attributes from QML code about dotherside HOT 3 CLOSED

@White-Oak
What's the 4th option? Just for being more clear in what i wrote in my previous message you can access the i-th argument with "arg0" because that's what the current implementation of DOtherSide does. See https://github.com/filcuc/DOtherSide/blob/master/lib/src/DosQMetaObject.cpp#L16

Obviously this is suboptimal given that we use "arg" as prefix instead of the name that the user wrote on its signal definition (however this solution simplify the development of the binding). Give me a couple of days for adding support in C++ (probably on a separate branch).

Thank you

from dotherside.

I would go with option 3.
Currently you can already obtain the signal argument from the qml slot.
If i'm not wrong inside a qml handler you can access the argument i-th argument with "arg0", "arg1" etc.

onNameChanged: console.log("name is", arg0)

from dotherside.

@filcuc ah, yes, so that's the fourth option to access attributes from qml handler.
Would be awesome to be able to register signals' attributes' names!

from dotherside.