Stricter postcodes for AT? about faker HOT 6 CLOSED

Alright, then I'll implement a change where

1. postcode() returns a random existing postcode
2. address() returns a valid postcode-city combination while keeping the format "{{streetAddress}}\n{{postcode}} {{city}}", so streetAdress will remain fake.

Cool?

Sounds good though its hard for me to decide where i have no clue how postalcodes in austria work.

But if you generate a valid postalcode city combination, the postalcode can also be valid from the same list right?

But we generate fake data. I do not really care much if a city name matches the postalcode where it is fake data. Meaning as long as the format is good im fine actually

from faker.

Imo a faker method should return valid data. If it is invalid it is useless to start with.

So if that means a lot of logic, then this is the case we have to deal with

from faker.

So this would then mean that you'd prefer a solution where

1. postcode() returns a valid postcode
2. address() returns a valid postcode-city combination?

To be 100% valid address() would of course also have to be a valid street-postcode-city combination, meaning a pretty extensive list of valid streets per city..

from faker.

So this would then mean that you'd prefer a solution where

1. postcode() returns a valid postcode
2. address() returns a valid postcode-city combination?

To be 100% valid address() would of course also have to be a valid street-postcode-city combination, meaning a pretty extensive list of valid streets per city..

Well we create fake data. This means that dummy names can be used there. However if we can build something that is more realistic it would always be good.

The most important thing imo is the format though

from faker.

Alright, then I'll implement a change where

1. postcode() returns a random existing postcode
2. address() returns a valid postcode-city combination while keeping the format "{{streetAddress}}\n{{postcode}} {{city}}", so streetAdress will remain fake.

Cool?

from faker.

Okay, than I'll just take the easier path and replace the existing randomly generated postcode with valid ones.

from faker.