facebook / bpfilter Goto Github PK

Hello @qdeslandes,

I have just compiled the bpfilter module on both the linux-6.1.14 branch and the bpf-next branch, both times I get the following output in dmesg:

[    4.619942] bpfilter: Loaded bpfilter_umh pid 971
[    4.622811] bpfilter: generate forward packet assessment
[    4.622823] bpfilter: generate forward packet assessment
[    4.625250] bpfilter: failed to create TC hook: No such file or directory
[    4.625348] bpfilter: failed to load chain INPUT in table filter: processed 73 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 4 peak_states 4 mark_read 3
[    4.625455] bpfilter: failed to install new table 'filter': No such file or directory
[    4.625578] bpfilter: failed to created filter table: No such file or directory
[    4.625807] bpfilter: read fail 0

Would you happen to know if I did something wrong?

Thanks a lot,
Mr. Hax

Hi , I install it but when i use iptables with option i have error iptables v1.8.9 (nf_tables): unknown option "--bpf".
How to install it correctly and using it?
i already start it @bpfilter/build/src# ./bpfilter
info : restored new codegen at 0x8006f0
info : restored new codegen at 0x800bb0
info : restored new codegen at 0x801070
info : cache already initialised, skipping initialisation
info : waiting for requests...

The original kernel introduction of bpfilter includes a series of usage examples via iptables ping and bpftool. A similar example set of commands (and perhaps expected log output from the bpfilter daemon) would be a huge help in confirming things are hooked in properly after building/loading the binary.

Potentially pairs with the new README.md note about libbpf 1.0 requirement.
This could also simply be a listing of the the earliest known-working/developer-tested version(s) of the kernel.

As of PR #12 I can't build on my kernel 5.15.x-based system. It seems the bpf_dynptr was introduced to bpf-next in May 2022. Guessing that puts a minimum kernel for dynptr somewhere around 5.18 or 5.19, which is past that of stock Ubuntu, RHEL, and SLE/SUSE releases according to wikipedia. libbpf 1.0.0 was August 22, 2022, so if libbpf and kernel need to move in-step, perhaps the required kernel is 6.0 or newer?

Totally understand if maintainers want to focus on current kernel releases rather than optional configs and work-around for old kernels, but might help avoid further "issue" reports to document a known minimum.

👀 I would like to point out that identifiers like “_bf_opts_parser” and “_stop_received” do eventually not fit to the expected naming convention of the C language standard.
💭 Would you like to adjust your selection for unique names?

i have a dream, where all nftables rules are tested statically before insertion into the kernel.

reading the bpfilter documentation, it seems that the daemon can be used (transparently?) as a backend for nftables userspace tools. did i understand that correctly?

if that's possible, i'd like to pull the generated BPF bytecode from bpfilter and pass it through uBPF in order to perform analysis against simulated packets.

does this seem like something that would work well with bpfilter as currently implemented?