Please add a license to the repo about nosql-database.org HOT 3 CLOSED

Dear Misha,

Good idea. I will. Give me a few days.

Thx & Best Regards
Stefan Edlich

Am 07.10.2016 06:11 schrieb "Misha Brukman" [email protected]:

Hi,

Thanks for putting together this collection of NoSQL databases!

Could you please add an explicit LICENSE file to the repo so that it's
clear under what terms the content is provided, and under what terms user
contributions are licensed?

Per GitHub docs on licensing
https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/#what-happens-if-i-dont-choose-a-license
:

Generally speaking, the absence of a license means that the default
copyright laws apply. This means that you retain all rights to your source
code and that nobody else may reproduce, distribute, or create derivative
works from your work. This might not be what you intend.

In case it's helpful, choosealicense.com provides a nice overview of
several popular open source licenses from which to choose. In this case,
since it's not code but documentation, perhaps CC-BY-4.0
http://choosealicense.com/licenses/cc-by-4.0/ is a good choice?

Thanks!

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#33, or mute the
thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAsEYFsou7D84_w1mJH8PVZnXlFCN1vcks5qxcZjgaJpZM4KQqOg
.

from nosql-database.org.

Done. Thanks.
Best Regards
Stefan E

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Stefan Edlich [email protected] wrote:

Dear Misha,

Good idea. I will. Give me a few days.

Thx & Best Regards
Stefan Edlich

Am 07.10.2016 06:11 schrieb "Misha Brukman" [email protected]:

Hi,

Thanks for putting together this collection of NoSQL databases!

Could you please add an explicit LICENSE file to the repo so that it's
clear under what terms the content is provided, and under what terms user
contributions are licensed?

Per GitHub docs on licensing
https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/#what-happens-if-i-dont-choose-a-license
:

Generally speaking, the absence of a license means that the default
copyright laws apply. This means that you retain all rights to your source
code and that nobody else may reproduce, distribute, or create derivative
works from your work. This might not be what you intend.

In case it's helpful, choosealicense.com provides a nice overview of
several popular open source licenses from which to choose. In this case,
since it's not code but documentation, perhaps CC-BY-4.0
http://choosealicense.com/licenses/cc-by-4.0/ is a good choice?

Thanks!

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#33, or mute the
thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAsEYFsou7D84_w1mJH8PVZnXlFCN1vcks5qxcZjgaJpZM4KQqOg
.

Viele Grüße Best Regards
Prof. Dr. Stefan Edlich

Beuth Hochschule für Technik, FB VI
Email: [email protected] (GChat / Hangout)
Skype: sedlich
Tel.: (+49)(0)1577-189.42.16 (+whatsapp)
http://edlich.de

from nosql-database.org.

Thank you, Stefan!

from nosql-database.org.