Spago configuration additions about purescript-flame HOT 3 CLOSED

Hello again @chekoopa

But I'm afraid there're old versions of Argonaut dependencies in the current package set. It would be fair to pin them for the moment, like:

Are you using a different configuration? The package-set specified is the latest psc-0.13.8-20200822 which contain these versions of argonaut.

Also, there are two lines to add in spago.dhall:

Good catch!

I wouldn't interfere with my own PR right now, as I'm now working with the library using symlinks into my src.

Are you working on #17 ? Sometimes I forget other people use this too, I was about to look into implementing thunks and keys 😅

from purescript-flame.

Hello, yes. 😄

Actually, thanks for remainding me to bump our pinned package-set (own-crafted Nix toolchain problems, hope to get rid of pinnings lately). Seems there's something wrong with Spago's way to work with local package-sets.

Have been sorting out another project and some issues on the personal side, now I'm in with integrating Flame into our project and yes, I'm already on #17. I'll start with elm-like Markdown proof-of-concept. And I think hooks wouldn't interfere with thunks and keys implemetation.

BTW, had some fun with channel injection into the model, so I could reuse websockets without page reloads. Hacky, but it works.

(it should been published hours ago, how could I forget to press Comment)

from purescript-flame.

That's fine, thanks. I was to look into these as an effort for https://github.com/melanchat/melanchat -- no one likes slow frontends :)

from purescript-flame.