File type about dry-types HOT 6 CLOSED

@kirs yes, it'm open to add more types like File. I'm gonna hold off a little bit though, as I'm planning to refine behavior of Type objects for the next version. It should not take too long, shooting for early March, maybe earlier.

from dry-types.

Does it mean that the public API will change?

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Piotr Solnica [email protected]
wrote:

@kirs https://github.com/kirs yes, it'm open to add more types like File.
I'm gonna hold off a little bit though, as I'm planning to refine behavior
of Type objects for the next version. It should not take too long,
shooting for early March, maybe earlier.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28 (comment).

from dry-types.

@kirs no, it's gonna be an internal clean up with refined internals and an improved API for defining custom types. I need to make sure that more complex types like sums, optionals, default-values can work correctly without too much internal complexity. Although it's hard to say which API is public, the lib is not stable in general (< 1.0). Can you tell me which APIs you depend on already?

from dry-types.

I don't depend on any particular API, just wondering about your plans about it.

from dry-types.

👍 for this feature; I'd be up for working on the File type.

from dry-types.

@jeremyf still up for the task? :)

from dry-types.