Tween callback params about dotween HOT 6 CLOSED

Hi!

I preferred to avoid params and/or specific parameter in order to have a cleaner and more usable method signature for callbacks. You can still pass the tween itself via lambda/closures, as long as you assign the callback after assigning the tween.

Cheers!

from dotween.

I'm just worried about the overhead of closures, for example if you add callbacks with element closure in the loop for move a array of elements.

from dotween.

I totally understand your worries, but it's better to have closures than to have to worry about having tweens that are too heavy, since every callback adds around 4B to the tween itself, even if unused. So closures seem to me like the best necessary evil. I'll ponder about this more though: let me know if you have more thoughts.

from dotween.

Closures doesn't work if use OnComplete in a for loop.

from dotween.

Hi @Demigiant, is there any solution to make it gc free without using lambda/closures or params[]?

from dotween.

Ahoy!
If you pass a direct reference to a method without generating an anonymous one via a lambda, GC is avoided there.
myTween.OnComplete(SomeOtherMethod)

from dotween.