scott, todd, jb, angie's nsf triplet on genome about bayessd HOT 2 OPEN

Answering your questions:

1. Does the mapping between action and the third column ("Definition") match your belief?

• Yes, definitely, i like the extra detail of separating assets in two classes ( supplier && distributor)

2. What is one thing you like about the table?

• That you tried to keep it simple. I would even try to simplify it even more for better memorization and operationalisation by users.

3. What is one thing you think can be improved from the table?

• More visual / icons / graphics that describe the flow / process of the different components.

from bayessd.

Looking good! This table is a nice operationalization of Design Thinking's classic venn diagram (Desirable, Technology feasable, economically viable) in terms of KPI's and risk-assessment.

I wonder where clininal trials and CRO's (contract research organisations) would fit in this table ?

Ah, also, you might like this process visualisation language from the 80's space program https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAKON

This JS implementation of it could be interesting for you to make a mockup of an interactive version of your table as an FSM (Finite State Machine) https://drakon.tech/read/state_machines

Other flow-based visual programming languages might be interesting as well as well as other niceities coming from CS/HCI such as Coloured Petri nets http://cpntools.org // https://cpnide.org

from bayessd.