Create containsAllIn matcher about matcher HOT 3 CLOSED

On thing that makes this tricky is that to match the semantics of other Iterable matchers in this package we'd want to support some looseness which means that a given element in the checked value could match more than one element of the expectation.

expect([2,1], containsAll([greaterThan(0), greaterThan(1)]);

My first greedy approach to solve this didn't work since the 2 matched the greaterThan(0) and failed to find a match for greaterThan(1). We might need to treat it like a bipartite matching problem.

from matcher.

looks like unorderedMatches suffers the same problem
#73

from matcher.

Thanks for the quick fix, Nate! :-)

from matcher.