Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (7)

PlasmaPower avatar PlasmaPower commented on May 17, 2024

The simplest solution would be to add a Drop impl to each of these types that calls try_pop in a loop, but atomic operations aren't strictly necessary, as we're guaranteed at the time drop is called that only one thread is accessing the structure.

I'm running into a related problem - a Into<Vec<T>> or more likely Into<Iterator<T>> implementation is missing. The implementation should be similar.

from crossbeam.

jeehoonkang avatar jeehoonkang commented on May 17, 2024

For ms queue & segmented queue, even if every element is popped, I think the sentinel node is still not deallocated. Note that the first sentinel node is created at, e.g., https://github.com/aturon/crossbeam/blob/master/src/sync/ms_queue.rs#L65, and later the just-popped element serves as the new sentinel. More concretely, I think the first sentinel node is leaked in the following code.

extern crate crossbeam;

fn main() {
  let queue = crossbeam::sync::MsQueue<i32>::new();
}

The Treiber stack does not suffer from this problem, because null serves as the sentinel in the stack.

from crossbeam.

Vtec234 avatar Vtec234 commented on May 17, 2024

The above is correct. The sentinel is leaked, as confirmed by valgrind for MsQueue:

==14055== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 7
==14055==    at 0x4C28EBF: malloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==14055==    by 0x14C66C: alloc::heap::allocate::h8f177ce216eebe59 (heap.rs:59)
==14055==    by 0x14C5E0: alloc::heap::exchange_malloc::h3e6e0f3cc2ffa7ba (heap.rs:138)
==14055==    by 0x15CA6F: new<crossbeam::sync::ms_queue::Node<i64>> (boxed.rs:235)
==14055==    by 0x15CA6F: _$LT$crossbeam..mem..epoch..Owned$LT$T$GT$$GT$::new::h7e0b820346f52ee7 (mod.rs:155)
==14055==    by 0x160A90: _$LT$crossbeam..sync..ms_queue..MsQueue$LT$T$GT$$GT$::new::hed250e14ac3da10e (ms_queue.rs:65)
==14055==    by 0x164FF6: crossbeam::sync::ms_queue::test::leak::h0b93c2b69d77a47c (ms_queue.rs:321)
==14055==    by 0x18E15E: {{closure}} (lib.rs:1360)
==14055==    by 0x18E15E: _$LT$F$u20$as$u20$test..FnBox$LT$T$GT$$GT$::call_box::hcd22cc8d960226e1 (lib.rs:140)
==14055==    by 0x1DB00A: __rust_maybe_catch_panic (lib.rs:98)
==14055==    by 0x18260A: try<(),std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<closure>> (panicking.rs:436)
==14055==    by 0x18260A: catch_unwind<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<closure>,()> (panic.rs:361)
==14055==    by 0x18260A: {{closure}} (lib.rs:1305)
==14055==    by 0x18260A: call_once<(),closure> (panic.rs:296)
==14055==    by 0x18260A: std::panicking::try::do_call::h515bb5f8d6547fa7 (panicking.rs:460)
==14055==    by 0x1DB00A: __rust_maybe_catch_panic (lib.rs:98)
==14055==    by 0x1891A6: try<(),std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<closure>> (panicking.rs:436)
==14055==    by 0x1891A6: catch_unwind<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<closure>,()> (panic.rs:361)
==14055==    by 0x1891A6: {{closure}}<closure,()> (mod.rs:357)
==14055==    by 0x1891A6: _$LT$F$u20$as$u20$alloc..boxed..FnBox$LT$A$GT$$GT$::call_box::h52f58ba131328272 (boxed.rs:605)
==14055==    by 0x1D2F14: call_once<(),()> (boxed.rs:615)
==14055==    by 0x1D2F14: start_thread (thread.rs:21)
==14055==    by 0x1D2F14: std::sys::imp::thread::Thread::new::thread_start::h76badbf9b0ecaf58 (thread.rs:84)

and SegQueue:

==13047== 280 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 7
==13047==    at 0x4C28EBF: malloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==13047==    by 0x14CDBC: alloc::heap::allocate::h8f177ce216eebe59 (heap.rs:59)
==13047==    by 0x14CD30: alloc::heap::exchange_malloc::h3e6e0f3cc2ffa7ba (heap.rs:138)
==13047==    by 0x15D70F: new<crossbeam::sync::seg_queue::Segment<u32>> (boxed.rs:235)
==13047==    by 0x15D70F: _$LT$crossbeam..mem..epoch..Owned$LT$T$GT$$GT$::new::h9528934703fbb5fa (mod.rs:155)
==13047==    by 0x169E43: _$LT$crossbeam..sync..seg_queue..SegQueue$LT$T$GT$$GT$::new::h5cf7a5734d4619f3 (seg_queue.rs:61)
==13047==    by 0x16B470: crossbeam::sync::seg_queue::test::leak::h9cbcb80048d7c26f (seg_queue.rs:136)
==13047==    by 0x18F3FE: {{closure}} (lib.rs:1360)
==13047==    by 0x18F3FE: _$LT$F$u20$as$u20$test..FnBox$LT$T$GT$$GT$::call_box::hcd22cc8d960226e1 (lib.rs:140)
==13047==    by 0x1DC2AA: __rust_maybe_catch_panic (lib.rs:98)
==13047==    by 0x1838AA: try<(),std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<closure>> (panicking.rs:436)
==13047==    by 0x1838AA: catch_unwind<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<closure>,()> (panic.rs:361)
==13047==    by 0x1838AA: {{closure}} (lib.rs:1305)
==13047==    by 0x1838AA: call_once<(),closure> (panic.rs:296)
==13047==    by 0x1838AA: std::panicking::try::do_call::h515bb5f8d6547fa7 (panicking.rs:460)
==13047==    by 0x1DC2AA: __rust_maybe_catch_panic (lib.rs:98)
==13047==    by 0x18A446: try<(),std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<closure>> (panicking.rs:436)
==13047==    by 0x18A446: catch_unwind<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<closure>,()> (panic.rs:361)
==13047==    by 0x18A446: {{closure}}<closure,()> (mod.rs:357)
==13047==    by 0x18A446: _$LT$F$u20$as$u20$alloc..boxed..FnBox$LT$A$GT$$GT$::call_box::h52f58ba131328272 (boxed.rs:605)
==13047==    by 0x1D41B4: call_once<(),()> (boxed.rs:615)
==13047==    by 0x1D41B4: start_thread (thread.rs:21)
==13047==    by 0x1D41B4: std::sys::imp::thread::Thread::new::thread_start::h76badbf9b0ecaf58 (thread.rs:84)

It should be relatively simple to free them in a Drop implementation, it just requires an additional explicit memory free for the sentinel after freeing the valid nodes.

from crossbeam.

fulmicoton avatar fulmicoton commented on May 17, 2024

It hit us in tantivy. We use MsQueue as a very small pool of searcher. Each searcher retains a bunch of Mmap object. Not dropping these object prevented munmap from being ever called.

Our client-side fix is here
quickwit-oss/tantivy@15fc049
and is similar to what is suggested by @apasel422 .

from crossbeam.

 avatar commented on May 17, 2024

@fulmicoton Ouch, sorry for the bug!

Unfortunately, that fix does not completely solve the problem. One allocated sentinel node still gets leaked. After popping all nodes, the last remaining step is something like:

drop(Vec::from_raw_parts(self.head.load(Relaxed, &guard).unwrap().as_raw(), 0, 1);

Someone interested in submitting a PR?

from crossbeam.

fulmicoton avatar fulmicoton commented on May 17, 2024

@stjepang no problem, it was not too difficult to locate the issue !

from crossbeam.

fulmicoton avatar fulmicoton commented on May 17, 2024

@stjepang awesome !

from crossbeam.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.