Specifying max solutions not working about python-mip HOT 6 CLOSED

Just tested now with 1.6.1 and it works fine, could you check ? : Python 3.7.4 (/usr/bin/python)

Using Python-MIP package version 1.6.1

Coin0008I air04 read with 0 errors

Welcome to the CBC MILP Solver Version: Trunk Build Date: Nov 29 2019 Starting solution of the Linear programming relaxation problem using Primal Simplex Coin0506I Presolve 645 (-178) rows, 7920 (-984) columns and 53032 (-19933) elements Clp1000I sum of infeasibilities 0.00171603 - average 2.66051e-06, 7117 fixed columns Coin0506I Presolve 411 (-234) rows, 764 (-7156) columns and 3762 (-49270) elements Clp0029I End of values pass after 746 iterations Clp0014I Perturbing problem by 0.001% of 1.0000001 - largest nonzero change 2.9925651e-05 ( 0.0014962825%) - largest zero change 2.95206e-05 Clp0000I Optimal - objective value 55547.038 Clp0000I Optimal - objective value 55547.038 Coin0511I After Postsolve, objective 55547.038, infeasibilities - dual 0 (0), primal 0 (0) Clp0014I Perturbing problem by 0.001% of 1 - largest nonzero change 2.9934324e-05 ( 0.0014967162%) - largest zero change 2.95206e-05 Clp0000I Optimal - objective value 55535.436 Clp0000I Optimal - objective value 55535.436 Clp0000I Optimal - objective value 55535.436 Coin0511I After Postsolve, objective 55535.436, infeasibilities - dual 0 (0), primal 0 (0) Clp0032I Optimal objective 55535.43639 - 0 iterations time 0.382, Presolve 0.03, Idiot 0.35 Starting MIP optimization maxSavedSolutions was changed from 0 to 10 integerTolerance was changed from 1e-06 to 1e-06 Continuous objective value is 55535.4 - 0.01 seconds Cgl0003I 382 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 1 substitutions Cgl0003I 23 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 2 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0003I 3 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 0 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions Cgl0004I processed model has 735 rows, 8462 columns (8462 integer (8462 of which binary)) and 64927 elements Cutoff increment increased from 1e-05 to 0.9999 Cbc0038I Initial state - 290 integers unsatisfied sum - 51.0753 Cbc0038I Pass 1: suminf. 8.60000 (26) obj. 58333.1 iterations 4997 Cbc0038I Pass 2: suminf. 4.00000 (8) obj. 58972.5 iterations 160 Cbc0038I Pass 3: suminf. 4.00000 (8) obj. 58972.5 iterations 18 Cbc0038I Pass 4: suminf. 4.00000 (8) obj. 58972.5 iterations 413 Cbc0038I Pass 5: suminf. 0.00000 (0) obj. 59389 iterations 140 Cbc0038I Solution found of 59389 Cbc0038I After 2.56 seconds - Feasibility pump exiting with objective of 59389 (stopping after 1 solutions) - took 1.75 seconds Cbc0012I Integer solution of 59389 found by feasibility pump after 0 iterations and 0 nodes (2.56 seconds) Cbc0019I Exiting on maximum solutions Cbc0005I Partial search - best objective 59389 (best possible 55535.436), took 0 iterations and 0 nodes (2.56 seconds) Cbc0035I Maximum depth 0, 0 variables fixed on reduced cost Cuts at root node changed objective from 55535.4 to 55535.4 Probing was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Gomory was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Knapsack was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Clique was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) MixedIntegerRounding2 was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) FlowCover was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) TwoMirCuts was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) ZeroHalf was tried 0 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds) Result - Stopped on solution limit Objective value: 59389.00000000 Lower bound: 55535.436 Gap: 0.07 Enumerated nodes: 0 Total iterations: 0 Time (CPU seconds): 2.59 Time (Wallclock seconds): 2.64 Total time (CPU seconds): 2.59 (Wallclock seconds): 2.64 <OptimizationStatus.FEASIBLE: 3>

Hmm, forgot that it could be specified as parameter in cbc. Fixed, released version 1.6.2 with the fix.