Conformance test names and descriptions are redundant, missing or inconsistent about k8s-conformance HOT 1 CLOSED

I agree, Testnames, Description part the comment section should be iterated properly. To the best of my knowledge I have added description and tried grouping tests using test name prefixes, etc.

I do understand that a carefully crafted Describe+Context+It blocks should make a human readable string that the the tool can use in place for Description. But having a Description field in the comment section will allow you to describe the test in detail with additional information nicely formatted as bullet points, etc.
When promoting a test to conformance, the idea is to then to say to the customer everything he needs to know about the test through the description field (instead for going back and changing top down all the wording from the Describe block onwards).
BTW: if there is no description field, the tool will just pick up text from Describe, Context and It blocks. (see v1.11 document in the end for tests that do not have documentation)

Release tag is introduced recently for the same reason, a non technical user need not have to go through and find when the source is changed but instead can rely on the tag to figure out when the test is added followed by release numbers when changes to the test happened.

from k8s-conformance.