Code Monkey home page Code Monkey logo

Comments (2)

clausecker avatar clausecker commented on June 20, 2024 1

Implemented this idea. Thanks a lot!

from pospop.

clausecker avatar clausecker commented on June 20, 2024

Thanks for the contribution! I've just benchmarked it and it seems to give a decent 4–5% improvement on my Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1610T @ 2.30GHz box:

name                      old speed      new speed       delta
Count8/sse2/1000-2        7.30GB/s ± 0%   7.51GB/s ± 0%  +2.84%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)
Count8/sse2/10000-2       9.10GB/s ± 0%   9.56GB/s ± 0%  +5.10%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Count8/sse2/100000-2      9.71GB/s ± 0%  10.23GB/s ± 0%  +5.36%  (p=0.000 n=9+11)
Count8/sse2/1000000-2     9.75GB/s ± 0%  10.25GB/s ± 0%  +5.13%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count8/sse2/10000000-2    8.98GB/s ± 1%   9.36GB/s ± 1%  +4.24%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count8/sse2/100000000-2   8.94GB/s ± 0%   9.29GB/s ± 0%  +3.93%  (p=0.000 n=11+9)
Count16/sse2/1000-2       7.16GB/s ± 0%   7.31GB/s ± 0%  +2.10%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count16/sse2/10000-2      9.07GB/s ± 0%   9.42GB/s ± 0%  +3.84%  (p=0.000 n=11+9)
Count16/sse2/100000-2     9.70GB/s ± 0%  10.23GB/s ± 0%  +5.47%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Count16/sse2/1000000-2    9.74GB/s ± 0%  10.26GB/s ± 1%  +5.34%  (p=0.000 n=10+11)
Count16/sse2/10000000-2   8.97GB/s ± 1%   9.36GB/s ± 1%  +4.29%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count16/sse2/100000000-2  8.92GB/s ± 1%   9.28GB/s ± 0%  +4.04%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count32/sse2/1000-2       7.01GB/s ± 0%   7.20GB/s ± 0%  +2.68%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count32/sse2/10000-2      9.06GB/s ± 0%   9.48GB/s ± 0%  +4.66%  (p=0.000 n=9+11)
Count32/sse2/100000-2     9.69GB/s ± 0%  10.21GB/s ± 0%  +5.34%  (p=0.000 n=9+11)
Count32/sse2/1000000-2    9.74GB/s ± 1%  10.26GB/s ± 1%  +5.37%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count32/sse2/10000000-2   8.98GB/s ± 1%   9.34GB/s ± 1%  +4.07%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count32/sse2/100000000-2  8.92GB/s ± 0%   9.28GB/s ± 0%  +4.00%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count64/sse2/1000-2       6.72GB/s ± 0%   6.85GB/s ± 0%  +1.98%  (p=0.000 n=9+11)
Count64/sse2/10000-2      9.00GB/s ± 0%   9.43GB/s ± 0%  +4.84%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)
Count64/sse2/100000-2     9.69GB/s ± 0%  10.20GB/s ± 0%  +5.30%  (p=0.000 n=9+11)
Count64/sse2/1000000-2    9.75GB/s ± 0%  10.25GB/s ± 0%  +5.17%  (p=0.000 n=10+11)
Count64/sse2/10000000-2   8.97GB/s ± 0%   9.34GB/s ± 1%  +4.04%  (p=0.000 n=11+11)
Count64/sse2/100000000-2  8.92GB/s ± 0%   9.27GB/s ± 0%  +3.85%  (p=0.000 n=9+8)

However, it also reduces performance by 4–8% on my Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4910MQ CPU @ 2.90GHz machine:

Count8/sse2/1000-8        11.6GB/s ± 1%  10.6GB/s ± 8%   -8.31%  (p=0.000 n=10+11)
Count8/sse2/10000-8       14.5GB/s ± 1%  13.7GB/s ± 7%   -5.21%  (p=0.001 n=11+11)
Count8/sse2/100000-8      15.4GB/s ± 2%  14.4GB/s ±11%   -6.09%  (p=0.001 n=11+11)
Count8/sse2/1000000-8     15.6GB/s ± 1%  14.7GB/s ± 7%   -5.35%  (p=0.002 n=10+11)
Count8/sse2/10000000-8    15.1GB/s ± 0%  14.0GB/s ±11%   -7.05%  (p=0.001 n=9+11)
Count8/sse2/100000000-8   13.8GB/s ± 1%  13.1GB/s ± 8%   -4.70%  (p=0.001 n=11+11)
Count16/sse2/1000-8       11.4GB/s ± 1%  10.4GB/s ± 3%   -8.78%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Count16/sse2/10000-8      14.4GB/s ± 1%  13.5GB/s ± 7%   -6.32%  (p=0.000 n=11+10)
Count16/sse2/100000-8     15.5GB/s ± 1%  14.5GB/s ± 5%   -6.04%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)
Count16/sse2/1000000-8    15.5GB/s ± 1%  14.5GB/s ± 9%   -6.95%  (p=0.001 n=10+11)
Count16/sse2/10000000-8   14.9GB/s ± 2%  14.2GB/s ±10%   -5.25%  (p=0.003 n=11+11)
Count16/sse2/100000000-8  13.8GB/s ± 1%  13.3GB/s ± 3%   -3.93%  (p=0.000 n=11+10)
Count32/sse2/1000-8       11.2GB/s ± 2%  10.4GB/s ± 4%   -7.46%  (p=0.000 n=11+10)
Count32/sse2/10000-8      14.4GB/s ± 1%  13.6GB/s ±11%   -5.64%  (p=0.002 n=10+11)
Count32/sse2/100000-8     15.4GB/s ± 2%  14.8GB/s ±11%   -4.05%  (p=0.004 n=11+11)
Count32/sse2/1000000-8    15.5GB/s ± 2%  14.9GB/s ±11%   -3.63%  (p=0.034 n=11+11)
Count32/sse2/10000000-8   14.9GB/s ± 2%  14.6GB/s ± 8%   -2.62%  (p=0.023 n=11+11)
Count32/sse2/100000000-8  13.8GB/s ± 1%  13.5GB/s ± 6%   -2.70%  (p=0.013 n=11+11)
Count64/sse2/1000-8       10.7GB/s ± 0%   9.5GB/s ±12%  -10.99%  (p=0.000 n=10+11)
Count64/sse2/10000-8      14.3GB/s ± 2%  13.5GB/s ± 6%   -5.35%  (p=0.001 n=11+10)
Count64/sse2/100000-8     15.5GB/s ± 0%  14.6GB/s ± 8%   -5.41%  (p=0.016 n=9+11)
Count64/sse2/1000000-8    15.6GB/s ± 0%  14.6GB/s ± 9%   -6.63%  (p=0.002 n=9+10)
Count64/sse2/10000000-8   15.0GB/s ± 1%  13.9GB/s ± 8%   -7.73%  (p=0.000 n=11+10)
Count64/sse2/100000000-8  13.7GB/s ± 1%  13.1GB/s ± 9%   -4.39%  (p=0.001 n=11+10)

I believe the key difference lies indeed in that one of the two might rename SSE registers while the other doesn't. Perhaps it is possible to reschedule the CSA cascade such that none of the results needs to be available early. We do get an extra register worth of breathing room from this, so it might not be as complex as it seems. I'll have to think about it.

Being able to fuse a load with one of the exclusive or operations is another interesting possibility. I'll have to benchmark it.

from pospop.

Related Issues (2)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.