[Question] Capacitor vs js about firebase-analytics HOT 2 CLOSED

Great question! I’ve once asked something similar in the capacitor slack group but did not got that much response:
https://getcapacitor.slack.com/archives/C88QP9W56/p1579510119015400

Not to hijack your thread, but here’s my question:

Question regarding Firebase Analytics. I see that @angular/fire now also supports analytics and remote config, and this just works like a charm. Including some nice provides that will hook into the angular router to determine page views and use the authenticated user to set the user id. (ScreenTrackingService, UserTrackingService). angular/angularfire#2178

Because this is working great in an Ionic app with Capacitor, is there still any need to use a capacitor plugin that provides this functionality? (e.g. https://github.com/philmerrell/capacitor-firebase-analytics or https://github.com/stewwan/capacitor-analytics). What’s the benefit of using the “web” vs native implementation?

Couple of things I can imagine are:

• native analytics have better access to native views like modals/alert/push notifications that could be of any interest
• web version has better integration in a angular setup (screentrackingservice)

from firebase-analytics.

as answered by @Boosten native analytics have better info despite the setup. it's worth it.

from firebase-analytics.