I find two questions in the codes. about treelib HOT 4 CLOSED

Thanks Cryin! You can solve the first problem by leaving the identifier parameter empty when creating a node. By default, a UUID (theoretically low probability to conflict) will be assigned when identifier is not present.

For the second, it is still absent in the library. Please feel free to add and give me a PR. Cheers!

from treelib.

Yes, you are right,i solve the first problem by store the full url path assignment identifier;

The second problem,In order to maintain the integrity of the treellib and can be maintained and upgraded.I write this function in my own code.So I put it up here:

def search_url_list(self,host,layers,filetype=''):
        self.link_list=[]
        for node in self.link_tree.children(self.root_node):
            if node.identifier == host:
                nodetmp=node
                self.foreach_same_layers(nodetmp,layers)
            #print x.identifier
            #print x.identifier
        return self.link_list

def foreach_same_layers(self, node, layers):
        if layers == 1:
            if node.data.url.strip():
                #print 'ret: '+node.identifier
                self.link_list.append(node)
                return node 
        ret=''
        #self.link_list=[]
        for subnode in self.link_tree.children(node.identifier):
            ret = self.foreach_same_layers(subnode, layers-1)
        return ret

use by search_url_list('subhost.host.com',3,None),
This will be able to get all of the depth of 3 node,i am sorry the code May not be easy to read ,just for reference.

from treelib.

I also looked into that topic some months ago. At the end of the day, the problem is the Tree object. But changing this would break everything.
This might be of interest for you http://anytree.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

from treelib.

Closing due to inactivity - also seems mostly solved?

from treelib.