`\braket{}` tex changed by `latexml` about latexml HOT 3 CLOSED

Right, good point. I think we can safely agree that the reversion is incorrect here - as you show it leads to an incorrect rendering.

So a fix that uses a proper reversion attribute on that DefMacro would be one possible healthy upgrade.

from latexml.

Based on discussions in some previous issues (#2092 (comment)), I don't think you should have the general expectation that the tex attribute will always retain the original TeX from the document source.

It's both technically a difficult question to solve in general, as well as a bit out-of-scope for LaTeXML's main purpose, which is conversion to structured formats.

We could patch this individual macro you've reported, adding an appropriate reversion directive in the binding here:

But this is certainly going to be just one of many possible cases where the tex attribute will not match up with the source file.

from latexml.

got it, thanks!

Just to clarify---in this case the math $\braket{a}{b}$ is not even equivalent to the original math:

\braket{a|b}: $\braket{a|b}$
\braket{a}{b}: $\braket{a}{b}$

Should I have an expectation that compiling the tex attribute as math should not even match the original output?

from latexml.