There are two different arities for the projects_onto relation about bfo HOT 4 CLOSED

From [email protected] on May 22, 2012 08:27:47

I agree.
I suggest

projects spatially onto for spatiotemporal region onto spatial region
projects temporally onto for spatiotemporal region onto temporal region

located_in for continuant in spatial region
occupies for occurrent in spatiotemporal region
spans for occurrent on temporal region

from bfo.

From [email protected] on May 22, 2012 09:52:43

projects spatially onto for spatiotemporal region onto spatial region
yes
projects temporally onto for spatiotemporal region onto temporal region
yes

located_in for continuant in spatial region
We already have located_at defined for this. located_in is continuant->continuant

occupies for occurrent in spatiotemporal region
the current definition of occupies covers both spatiotemporal region and temporal region. I'm fine splitting to two cases by making occupies only to spatiotemporal regions and making spans (not keen on the label) being only for temporal regions. I'm also fine leaving them as one relation and not including spans (since it is easily defined as a shortcut relation should we want it later).

spans for occurrent on temporal region

from bfo.

From [email protected] on May 23, 2012 08:49:37

Status: Started

from bfo.

From [email protected] on June 15, 2012 09:53:29

Fixed

Status: Fixed

from bfo.