Consider changing namespace from boost::asio to anything else about dir_monitor HOT 2 OPEN

I'm new to the community so not likely to be the best one to decide. Ask the folks in slack for opinions i think. However, personally I would never put anything in boost namespace unless it would be proposed to become part of boost, which this never will. It depends on boost, that's all. I would set the namespace to simply be dir_monitor, although I prefer the namespacing of java and dotnet where it's org.lib to avoid clashing later. could use berkus.dir_monitor.

from dir_monitor.

I didn't invent this - this was done by Boris long time ago, I guess he was aiming to make it part of asio eventually (but why?).

Any suggestions what the proper namespace would be? boost::filesystem? :)

from dir_monitor.